View Poll Results: Which is more reliable?
- Voters
- 84. You may not vote on this poll
-
Japanese
62 73.81% -
European
22 26.19%
Results 31 to 40 of 127
-
June 30th, 2005 12:49 PM #31Originally Posted by ultimate
In addition, what's bad with being "older".... A bit too sensitive here
-
June 30th, 2005 12:54 PM #32
In addition, who ever said that "US Standard" is the best????
The main reason why the US usually gets bigger engine sizes is because of market demands! Nothing more.
What in the world with folks in Italy do with a 6 liter SUV? They don't need it therefore they dont sell it there. Period.
Unfit for US Highways??? US Highways are so moron-proof that you can drive blindfolded geez... hehe...
Vans: They prefer car-like amenities like the Caravans.
SUV: Patrols and Prados are abundant in Europe, Africas, and Japan. Nissan has always been concentrating more on the mid-car battle more than anything else.
-
June 30th, 2005 02:40 PM #33
Actually, both lines of reasoning are correct.
The reason that some of these vehicles are not sold in the US is because these companies don't see the profit in bringing them up to the safety and pollution standards of a market that does not favor cheap economical transport or low horsepower diesel applications. They are "unfit" only in the sense that they are not equipped with the safety equipment and pollution control that is mandatory in the US. Heck, up until one model change ago, neither were the locally sold sedans, which DO meet and often times EXCEED these requirements in US trim.
By the way, the MB100 is not European, it's Indonesian. :p
And incidentally, japanese rep-mobiles have proven to be the MOST reliable cars in the US for the past two decades.
European cars in general are not as reliable as Japanese cars. Most people are biased in thinking they are merely because most Euro-cars we have here are the expensive ones... and are more likely to be taken to the "casa" by their owners (or former owners) than cheaper japanese cars. Ask anyone who owns an MG, a Vauxhall, or a Renault about quality on cheap European cars... or even Volkswagens or Jaguars. Quality is usually similar or worse than comparable Japanese cars.
Heck, the function of price versus quality can be summed up by the Kia Pride. In the hands of a responsible owner, they can last a very very very long time. But most people buy them for the lower price, and are less likely to spend money on proper maintenance. Thus the undeserved reputation for poor quality for what was undoubtedly the VolksWagen ("People's Car) of its day.
Ang pagbalik ng comeback...
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 123
June 30th, 2005 03:11 PM #34Originally Posted by pissword
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 123
June 30th, 2005 03:29 PM #35Originally Posted by parakitoJDM
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 123
June 30th, 2005 03:32 PM #36Originally Posted by theveed
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 123
June 30th, 2005 03:43 PM #37Originally Posted by theveed
-
June 30th, 2005 05:05 PM #38
I take offense to the term "piece of ****" when applied to the car that put Ford back on the map and that managed to re-write many of the rules of handling for front-wheel drive cars, and, by the way, is a major step up for Ford in terms of quality... I guess it's a piece of **** if all that matters is pillowy chairs and idling along at 60mph on the interstate...
Of course, maybe you're comparing it to all the overweight, over-engined, gas-guzzling circa-1970's tech cars and SUVs that everyone else is driving in the US?
By the way, diesel is NOT banned. It's just that emissions regulations make diesel cars a little more costly in the US. There is a bias in the US against diesel power, but diesel cars ARE sold there.
Cars that DO not pass safety regs in the US are not inherently unsafe... it's just that setting them up to US spec was deemed too costly by their manufacturers to warrant the effort. The extra airbags are NOT required in other markets. Except for AUVs and the formulaic "Asian Van" (L300 et al), there's nothing wrong with these cars.
In fact, American made and marketed SUVs like the Tahoe and Explorer are even more unsafe at highway speeds than most other cars, despite the standard safety equipment.
And yes, driving conditions in the US are easy compared to most other places... wider roads, better paving and surfacing, better asphalt and water-drainage properties... which also makes them very dangerous for US drivers who suddenly find themselves in wet or icy conditions and who have no idea how to adapt to such.
The only "Europeans" with Asian underpinnings are the MB100 van, and the MB-engined SSangyongs. AFAIK, our BMWs, Mercs, and Volvos are CBU from Europe.
American driving is just so SOFT... and the cars are equally so...
-
June 30th, 2005 06:30 PM #39Originally Posted by ultimate
Lalo na Oldsmobile, pangalan palang haha. :D
-
July 1st, 2005 12:21 AM #40
mazdamazda,
your reasoning that japanese cars are not reliable because "all the posts in the Workshop are about jap cars" is incorrect. iilan lang ba may european cars dito?
for your personal experience of shitty quality, i will offer the service record of our cr-v which has needed nothing at all more than regular oil changes. our other cr-v is similarly reliable. our corona and accord have also been reliable, nothing unusual beyond reasonable age-related wear. hehe
Choice I would have made as well.:nod:
2024 Innova Zenix 2.0 V CVT (non-HEV) vs Innova...