Results 1 to 10 of 34
Hybrid View
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Posts
- 5
July 11th, 2007 04:17 AM #1Hi! I need some advice so I can chose whether to get a 07 CRV 2.0 4x2 M/T, since 6months of waiting for the 4x4 is too long, or a Fortuner 2.5DSL A/T.
thx.
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 4,459
-
July 11th, 2007 04:33 AM #3
better go to car comparison bro para makita mo pros and cons ng crv at innova then decide.
try this link for crv 07
http://tsikot.yehey.com/forums/showthread.php?t=35101
-
Tsikot Member Rank 2
- Join Date
- Jan 2003
- Posts
- 416
July 11th, 2007 10:00 AM #4
-
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Posts
- 41
-
March 7th, 2008 09:49 AM #7
-
March 7th, 2008 11:48 AM #8
I'd get the CRV primarily because of its riding comfort. 4X2 will suffice if you spend more time in the city but the 4X4 variant will definitely help you round the bends on out-of-town trips.
And if I were to get a Fort this year, I'd get the 3.0 hands down.
But then again I'd be thinking that the Fort is a 4 year old favorite na and its design will start aging real soon.
just my :twocents:
-
March 7th, 2008 06:15 PM #9
The only Fort worth getting (sorry Fort boys) is the 4x4 diesel. The Fortuner is compromised as a city car. It's too stiff and it's too wide. The wheels poke out of the body work, making it difficult to maneuver on small streets. I've experienced this on my test-drives, and I've been the victim of this on the road, when a Hilux 4x4 (same width as the Fort) wedged me in against the wall.
It's a good thing that his tires were soft, they didn't leave a mark.
Where the Fort shines is in moderate off-roading. It's got good ground clearance and a good center differential, but for rougher stuff, I'd prefer the LSD-equipped Everest (though the ride of the Eve isn't anything to write home about, either).
The CR-V is a much better road car, the 4x2 is quite fuel efficient for a gasoline CUV (just don't expect miracles), it's much more comfortable and maneuverable. Like the Civic, it's the base model CR-V that makes the most sense, if only because of the new R-series engine (the base Civic 1.8 and the base CR-V 2.0 both use "R" engines, while the Civic 2.0 and the CR-V 2.4 use the powerful but thirsty "K" engines).
Ang pagbalik ng comeback...
-
March 7th, 2008 09:15 PM #10
If I have the money? I guess I will spend it with the new [H] CR-V!
While I was walking along HK Sun Plaza earlier, it was dusk. I saw Fortuners every 30 seconds... Imagine that, it's everywhere! And yes, I am not after parts.Last edited by drey; March 7th, 2008 at 09:36 PM.
iam3739.com
And also edit option is not allowed anymore :grin:
Problems with viewing Tsikot on non-Chromium...