New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 41 to 49 of 49
  1. Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    17
    #41
    I have driven the new Lancer and believe me, it feels like driving a Formula 1 (as if i have driven a F1 car before) not because of peformance but it seems like I've lost 2 lbs already because of the matagtag issue again... hehehe.. Sorry for sharing this...

  2. Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,113
    #42
    Quote Originally Posted by niky View Post
    Part of the CVT issue was confusion amongst the dealerships as to the appropriate transmission fluid to use. This was corrected via a TSB, which instructs dealerships to use the special CVTF instead of the regular ATF used for the rest of the fleet. Most affected CVT cars should have been checked for problems due to this, already.

    The other problem with Honda's CVT is that they use a start-up clutch instead of a torque converter. In other words, instead of a fluid coupling mechanism, there's a friction point where the CVT interacts with the drive wheels. With aggressive driving, coupled with the aforementioned CVTF issue, the clutches could wear down prematurely... and expensively.

    Use the CVT properly (and not like a boy-racer, yo... ), and you should have no problems. I know a bunch of people who've had the CVT since launch with no issues.

    -----

    Still, these issues, along with customer complaints about transmission response (unwarranted, personally... it's fine just the way it is) and the fact that newer automatics and new engine programming that gives a fairer spread of torque provide similar or better fuel economy have lead to Honda dropping the CVT in favor of a more conventional 5-speed torque-converter automatic.

    -----

    But this won't matter to Mitsubishi drivers. The Mitsubishi CVT uses a conventional torque converter instead of clutches. In other words, it will be no more unreliable than the regular automatic transmission found in the Civic... and it's more responsive and better geared, to boot.

    -----

    RE: brands... while Honda, overall, is a pretty good brand... they have their share of issues... the horrendous fuel consumption and weak engine mounts of Gen.2 CR-Vs... (at least we didn't get the burning CR-Vs that the US did (oil filter issue), transmission durability issues on old Accords... poor rubber bushings on first-generation Jazzes... bizarre exploding windshield issues on EG Civics (as well as the rust thing). They're good, but nobody's perfect.

    Of course, in this case, Mitsubishi has more points against them (with a scandal sheet too long to enumerate), but this is a brand new car and shares nothing with the old Lancer... based on world-car technology co-developed with Chrysler and Hyundai. The suspension feels perfect, the engine is great, the body is ultra-stiff... it's really a cut above the rest and a sure winner in its class for Car of The Year.

    Oh, yes, the suspension. Complaining about the old Lancer's suspension when talking about this car is like complaining about the Gen.2 CRV 2.0's fuel economy when talking about the Gen.3 CRV 2.0... it's a completely different engine in the new CRV. Likewise, it's a completely different engine, suspension and car we're talking about with this new Lancer.

    The only worry, really, is whether the local Mitsubishi service centers can do this car justice. One can only hope that the recent recovery of Mitsubishi in terms of sales has allowed them to upgrade their service centers.
    thanks niky! well, in that case, if i were choosing....new Focus TDCi na! Hehehe.. sorry OT.

    Quote Originally Posted by snake888 View Post
    I have driven the new Lancer and believe me, it feels like driving a Formula 1 (as if i have driven a F1 car before) not because of peformance but it seems like I've lost 2 lbs already because of the matagtag issue again... hehehe.. Sorry for sharing this...
    hmmm...2 lbs, the wifey will love it! but still don't get it, di pa ko nakaka-drive kasi ng Formula 1. para mas down to earth, how 'matagtag' is it compared sa, say, a Jimny?

  3. Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    22,704
    #43
    Not as much. I didn't think it was "matagtag" when I drove it... but a short test drive on proving grounds just doesn't match pothole-hurdling on city streets. I did feel some stiffness, but it's what you'd expect of having 18" wheels (on the EX).

    Mhmmm... Jimny... I still want one... despite the harsh ride, it's an interesting toy...

    Ang pagbalik ng comeback...

  4. Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    6,940
    #44
    Been driving my unit for a week now, di naman matagtag sarap pa nga e feels solid actually..

  5. Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,305
    #45
    Ayaw nyo ng Focus?

  6. Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    780
    #46
    Ganda nga ng bagong Lancer ngayon at di pa masyadong nagkalat sa daan. Pero kung para kay esmi ay boto ako sa Civic.

  7. Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    6,940
    #47
    Timing chain pala tong lancer...tuwing kelan ang palitan neto at magkano kaya?

  8. Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    22,704
    #48
    You never have to replace a timing chain.

    Ang pagbalik ng comeback...

  9. Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    65
    #49
    Quote Originally Posted by oliver1013 View Post
    Been driving my unit for a week now, di naman matagtag sarap pa nga e feels solid actually..
    +1

    hindi matagtag kahit 18" rims. nag sakay ako apat na heavyweights, pareho lang rin ang feel ng kotse kung ako lang nag drive.

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
08 Lancer 2.0 MX  or Civic 1.8S AT