
Originally Posted by
JackFlash
I agree. Besides a bloody revolution isn't exactly a guarantee for better government. Cambodia, China, Cuba and several banana republics in Lat Am and Africa had their share of bloody revolutions, yet where are they now? With the exception of China, hardly any better from where they 1st started. On 2nd thought, we only get to know about the rosy picture of China because its authoritarian govt censors what gets published as news.
If the Pinas were to have a bloody revolution, what guarantee do we have that its leaders won't be as corrupt or more despotic than the ones they seek to replace? If the senate hearings are any indication, I can almost imagine Trillanes strutting around like Hitler if by some stroke of luck, he succeeded with his coup.