New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 39 of 39
  1. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    453
    #21
    both ba yan front and back?

  2. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    68
    #22
    1 lang, para sa harapan. btw, kabatas pala yung sakin.

  3. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    453
    #23
    wait. how can u get exempted from color coding kung harap lang? eh di kita parin ung likod mo

  4. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    109
    #24
    I dont think BF would want to get rid of the UUVVRP immediately...
    There has been a lot of studies conducted and volumes of paper work
    that were involved here... He might want to consult his predecessors
    before acting against it... dami na nga niya nakabangga eh...

    Though I really like the EDSA rerouting scheme he applied in West/North EDSA
    and Munoz... saved me a lot of travel time.. :D

    Di ba may plan siya to put cameras on strategic areas sa EDSA and paint big ID numbers on top of buses?... okay na okay to, wala nang hulihan, tapos penalize
    na lang yung owners/operators ng buses pag pinaparegister na nila yung buses nila
    di ba?... wala sila kawala kasi may pix yung bus nila with numbers when and where
    they had the violation... la na lagayan... sana matuloy....

  5. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    536
    #25
    yipee.. sana matuloy na nga yan, para di nako manghihiram pa ng sasakyan kada lunes.. yun nga lang wag naman sana mag kabuhol buhol ang trapik

  6. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    60
    #26
    i've been hearing about this too... sana nga totoo na.
    di naman volume ng vehicles ang problema kundi mga walang disciplinang drivers...
    especially mga bus sa EDSA, dyip, pati na din tricycle.

  7. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    29,354
    #27
    I think the color coding scheme still has some life to it. What should be done is to reduce the area covered by the color coding. Like when the odd-even scheme was first implemented, it was only on major roads only like EDSA, Quezon Ave and the like. Maybe a return to that scheme might help people use the secondary roads more.

  8. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    6,385
    #28
    Quote Originally Posted by Dianne
    Di ba may plan siya to put cameras on strategic areas sa EDSA and paint big ID numbers on top of buses?... okay na okay to, wala nang hulihan, tapos penalize
    na lang yung owners/operators ng buses pag pinaparegister na nila yung buses nila
    di ba?... wala sila kawala kasi may pix yung bus nila with numbers when and where
    they had the violation... la na lagayan... sana matuloy....
    Sana nga la nang lagayan. Yun nga lang, pag ganito na at ang mga may-ari na ang mag-aareglo, e d tuloy ang panggugulo ng mga bus, at tuloy lang ang paglalagay sa itaas. Oh well, pareho tayong umaasang sana hindi na ganito.

    Quote Originally Posted by ghosthunter
    What should be done is to reduce the area covered by the color coding. Like when the odd-even scheme was first implemented, it was only on major roads only like EDSA, Quezon Ave and the like. Maybe a return to that scheme might help people use the secondary roads more.
    Well, with BF doing the "clearing" on alot of streets, the idea of making use of secondary roads is more feasible now.

  9. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    68
    #29
    Quote Originally Posted by newbee
    wait. how can u get exempted from color coding kung harap lang? eh di kita parin ung likod mo
    pag nakita yung likod mo e di ituro mo yung harap :lol:

    seriously, siyemre dapat i-retain mo at least 1 orig plate #. Para at least meron pa rin identification yung car mo.

  10. Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    37
    #30
    Quote Originally Posted by ozcity
    DESIPLINA lang ang SOLUSYON...
    tol, di naman sa hindi ako sumasang-ayon sa iyo, pero disiplina eh one of the solution lang yan. Sa ibang bansa disiplinado mga drivers pero matindi pa rin ang traffic dahil sa volume at makipot na daan.

    ang malaking posibility talaga na ma-solve ang problem is by mass transport. sa ibang bansa na solve ng mass transport. Dito rin masosolve ng mass transport. Ako sasakay ako sa tren at hindi na magdadala ng tsikot kung maganda at interlinked ang mass transport natin.

    Ngunit may malaking PERO. Ito ang security. Maganda nga ang mas transport natin eh binobomba naman eh talagang walang gagamit niyan.

    Kaya para sa akin, bitayin lahat ng terroristang yan. Mag-implement ng matinding mass transport. Bitayin din ang mga corrupt na magpapa-implement ng mass transport (kasama govt officials who approve contracts to poor performing contractors). Alisin ang mga sidewalk vendors. Alisin ang parking ng mga buildings na sidewalk ang ginawang parking. Maglagay ng tamang pedestrian lanes, at hayaang sagasaan ang hindi gagamit nito.

    Tignan lang natin kung di talaga masolve yan. Yun nga lang, mahirap gawin ito... Kelangan natin si Hitler...

  11. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    1,114
    #31
    removing sidewalk vendors is a solution

    jaywalkers must be apprehended.

    how about flyover with escalators? everyone know na tamad tayo lahat umakyat kaya jaywalk nalang... hehehe may pondo naman pinas eh, kurakot officials lang.

    jeepney stops/bus stops >> how about every 3 blocks may loading and unloading?

    MMDA officers caught in the act of bribery will get harsh punishment!

    sana ako nalang MMDA Chairman! :P

  12. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    10,603
    #32
    basta i-enforce lang nila ang batas luluwang na ang kalye......

  13. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    4,614
    #33
    disciplining drivers would improve traffic flow to a much greater extent than any traffic scheme would... and would tackle the problem at one of the roots, imo.

    maybe it won't necessarily eliminate traffic jams altogether, but schemes are more ineffective and counter-productive in the long run. stopgap solutions lang yan, while the real problem grows.

    for example, how many traffic jams could have been prevented if motorists are considerate and concerned enough not to block intersections if the road is already filled up with traffic?

    sa Katipunan-C.P. Garcia junction, laging nagbubuhol yung traffic dun kasi 2 lanes lang yung c.p. garcia pero yung mga nag-le-left turn ginagawang 4 lanes yung left turn... thus bottlenecking at the c.p. garcia entry.

    sa Santolan, one lane lang yung road in many places sa dami ng mga naka-illegal parking...

    how many traffic jams or slowdowns at least are caused by coutnerflowing drivers? by slow tricycles plying major roads? by vehicles not following the "passing lane, slow lane, slow lane, shoulder" arrangement in highways? by PUVs that stop in the middle of the road to load/unload passengers every 5 meters? by vehicles that are travelling too slowly on major roads? by buses that WAIT to be filled with passengers, never mind if it takes hours while they occupy whole lanes of the road in doing so?

    :|

  14. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    71
    #34
    TANG INA!!! :evil: Bobo talaga ang gobyerno sa Pinas.

    Instead of lessening the volume of the vehicles on the road, the gov't should allocate a good budget for the DPWH, dapat gawin ng DPWH every year is add more roads, fix roads, road widenings ex. SLEX should be three lanes both side pero 2 on each side pa rin kaya dapat instead of SLEX it should be South Luzon Slow Way. But corruption would just ruin the plans. Plus the gov't should revamp the LTO as in linisin e putcha kahit di ka marunong mag drive makakakuha ka ng lisensya basta maglagay ka lang.

    Just my .03 cents

  15. Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    103
    #35
    narinig ko sa radio na tatanggalin na talaga ang coding come january 2003.

  16. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    82
    #36
    Quote Originally Posted by Visitor
    TANG INA!!! :evil: Bobo talaga ang gobyerno sa Pinas.

    Instead of lessening the volume of the vehicles on the road, the gov't should allocate a good budget for the DPWH, dapat gawin ng DPWH every year is add more roads, fix roads, road widenings ex. SLEX should be three lanes both side pero 2 on each side pa rin kaya dapat instead of SLEX it should be South Luzon Slow Way. But corruption would just ruin the plans. Plus the gov't should revamp the LTO as in linisin e putcha kahit di ka marunong mag drive makakakuha ka ng lisensya basta maglagay ka lang.

    Just my .03 cents
    There was one article long, long ago just right after Cory assumed power over the Marcoses. This article told of the plight of a former President? or Chairman of the defunct CDCP. The C-5 project has been there since the time of the Marcoses. There was another project which was kinda overlooked due to perhaps lack of funds or change of management (government transitions). The project was somewhat like another C-5 but this time, this would link Alabang to the "Cuyab line". The Cuyab line is a narrow road, somewhat coastal in nature that traverses thru the barangays of the towns in Laguna enroute to the Kalayaan ave. at C5 itself. This Cuyab line would be the developed into an elevated road that stretches the whole length of the said route.

    Maraming projects, maraming drawing. There was also another project that plans to connect Sta. Rosa, Laguna with Makati thru a monorail/MRT like train. Perhaps this was in view of the Calabarzon Project.

    Like I said, maraming project, maraming drawing. :? :? :?

  17. Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    103
    #37
    guys, 2003 na bukas!! happy new year!! so ANO NA BA TALAGA ang decision dito sa 2003 coding?

  18. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    291
    #38
    sana nga wla na..
    peace out !

  19. Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    20
    #39
    oo nga sana wala na coding, pro sana may gawin din ang gov't, kumilos na sila, 2003 na eh, new year na dapat new and much better life, :mrgreen: :mrgreen: HAPPY NEW YEAR!!! :lol: :lol:

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
NO MORE CODING IN 2003