Results 141 to 150 of 211
-
January 7th, 2010 11:47 AM #141
-
January 7th, 2010 12:21 PM #142
The TRO in the case filed by concerned parties against the DOTC and LTO to stop implementation of the RFID should be issued by the court shortly. While I don't doubt the intent, I doubt that the LTO has the authority to impose such fees for a project that has never received proper approvals from NEDA and other agencies.
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Posts
- 89
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Posts
- 469
January 7th, 2010 06:21 PM #144Kung naka-implement na yan.... At naka Luxury ka, PAKTAY ka sa CARNAPPER.
Aba, ewan natin kung makakapag katiwalaan ba ang mga law enforcers na hahawak ng mga RFID reader na yan! Baka isa sa mga hahawak diyan, ehh carnapper, lilitaw pa naman addresses and car owner name doon, madali hanapin sa NSO address natin niyan. PAKTAY KA!
-
January 7th, 2010 09:13 PM #145
What if naka V-kool clear tint ka tapos dinikit mo RFID behind the vkool, madedetect parin ba?
-
January 8th, 2010 09:57 AM #146
-
January 12th, 2010 10:01 AM #147
wala naman daw address na i istore.. basically.. about the car lang yung info.. ang pinaka info lang na nandon daw eh yung name of owner..
-
January 12th, 2010 12:43 PM #148
-
January 12th, 2010 02:57 PM #149
onga pala, pano kaya sa mga bagong sasakyan, since multi-year ang initial registration nila. if so, then LTO's so called plan to have all vehicles tagged with RFID by the end of this year won't materialize din pala. hay, ang gulo talaga ng sistema nila about this RFID.
even LTO's site is not updated to explain everything about this RFID.:crash:
-
Interesting thread—really important to consider the broader impact of the National ID Law beyond...
National ID Law