LTO to implement RFID tags

[james00112233]

I would be for it but with a twist.

RFID tags limited to:
Public utility vehicles.(jeepneys, bus, taxi, rental cars)
Emergency vehicles (police, ambulance, firetrucks)
All government vehicles
Vehicles registered to politicians and immediate families.

+1. In this case, the public will know who are abusing especially on the government vehicles where sometimes they used it for "private" purpose.

[Memphis Raines]

This identification system is invasive and potentially dangerous if it falls into the wrong hands :diablo:

[p_borj]

a big NO NO for me.

[kenshinx]

No info re: RFID on LTO website

[p_borj]

mawawala privacy mo dito. lahat ng pinuntahan mo mata-track.

[impulzz]

nasa inquirer kahapon Sept. 21, page a-18 it's a picture of a man like he's praying then nasa tabi yung info about RFID.

[Mile2]

LTO should first clarify to public what type of information should be included in the RFID chip aside from the Car Registration number, vehicle plate number, chassis number, make and model, color and type?

What extent of the owner information should be embedded in the chip? Since some malicious parties could just buy scanners and collects information on everyone roaming the streets.

I've heard that LTO discloses that it would cost P200 for RFID, I'm worried that this RFID has loop holes and vulnerabilities. It's just the same principle with canine e-tag, buy a scanner and you can read them all.

[Super Inggo]

It was a Stradcom project and all money will be going to Stradcom, of course with LTO and FG's will have their fair share

next month, you can have the ID (actually it's a sticker that you have to place in your windshield) for free, but it will be replaced when you register your car next year.

[OldSchoolHack]

If it has information you can already visually see from a car, it wouldn't matter if someone scans it. Nakikita naman license plate, car model and make, color and registration.

Mas relevant kung this is used on public transports, emergency vehicles, government owned vehicles and military vehicles.

And as long as none of it is valid for evidence (as in someone can remove it and place it on another vehicle for malicious intent) then it should not be an issue. Kung traffic monitoring lang ang purpose, pwede na.

Actually di mo na need ito para makita at mahuli mga luxury cars with government plates being used on a sunday or holiday. Punta ka lang sa Alabang Town Center on sundays madami duon red plate.

[paolorenzo]

It was a Stradcom project and all money will be going to Stradcom, of course with LTO and FG's will have their fair share

Galing mo sir! Unang pumasok sa isip ko nung nabasa ko 'to... With such a ridiculous, expensive-to-implement project like this, FG can't be far behind. Sometimes I think FG makes Imelda look like a saint.

This RFID tag is nothing but corruption in disguise.

[redeemed]

+1. In this case, the public will know who are abusing especially on the government vehicles where sometimes they used it for "private" purpose.

+1M para malaman sang club nagpupunta... kaso, baka may exemption na naman...

[Gumusut_Amige]

If it has information you can already visually see from a car, it wouldn't matter if someone scans it. Nakikita naman license plate, car model and make, color and registration.

agree with this, then LTO just embed it to the registration stickers... not to introduce another stand alone tags for us to handle!

[lloydwena]

nu itsura ng rf tag?

[ghosthunter]

nu itsura ng rf tag?

[SIZE="4"]
REMINDER: do not post in SMS/TXT format.

READ the RULES.[/SIZE]

[jjmd3_787]

I concur with GH! Dapat sa PUVs, gov't vehicles, and emergency services lang ang RFID. Hindi pa ba sapat ang nararanasang harassment ng mga private motorists mula sa mga corrupt traffic enforcers/authorities, poor road/infrastrucutre conditions, at windshield-punas boys ?

A fee of php350 will be imposed for the chips. Dagdag pasanin uli ito. OK lang sana kung matino ang pamamalakad nila.

'Ganda talaga ng timing para next year. Isama mo na din yung balak i-increase sa 200% ang PAGIBIG fund collections. Nabuko na kasi pag gamit nila sa OWWA, GSIS, at PhilHealth funds nuong past election.