Results 1 to 10 of 211
Hybrid View
-
September 22nd, 2009 01:34 PM #1
Yeah it's certainly an invasion the one's privacy.
I think they should implement it to PUBLIC vehicles first, especially those for transportation...
-
September 22nd, 2009 01:51 PM #2
-
September 22nd, 2009 02:13 PM #3
This identification system is invasive and potentially dangerous if it falls into the wrong hands :diablo:
-
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Posts
- 89
-
-
September 22nd, 2009 03:56 PM #7
nasa inquirer kahapon Sept. 21, page a-18 it's a picture of a man like he's praying then nasa tabi yung info about RFID.
Last edited by impulzz; September 22nd, 2009 at 04:02 PM.
-
September 22nd, 2009 05:47 PM #8
LTO should first clarify to public what type of information should be included in the RFID chip aside from the Car Registration number, vehicle plate number, chassis number, make and model, color and type?
What extent of the owner information should be embedded in the chip? Since some malicious parties could just buy scanners and collects information on everyone roaming the streets.
I've heard that LTO discloses that it would cost P200 for RFID, I'm worried that this RFID has loop holes and vulnerabilities. It's just the same principle with canine e-tag, buy a scanner and you can read them all.Last edited by Mile2; September 22nd, 2009 at 05:49 PM.
-
September 22nd, 2009 05:59 PM #9
It was a Stradcom project and all money will be going to Stradcom, of course with LTO and FG's will have their fair share
next month, you can have the ID (actually it's a sticker that you have to place in your windshield) for free, but it will be replaced when you register your car next year.
-
September 22nd, 2009 07:20 PM #10
For modern cars... people forget that coolants have a lifespan and that they need to be replaced. ...
Overheating and mitigation methods