Results 41 to 50 of 75
-
June 1st, 2011 11:29 AM #41
Time to buy an MRAP. Something like this, perhaps: Conquest Vehicles | Home
-
-
June 1st, 2011 12:07 PM #43
Physics will definitle help a lot if details are complete of course. hehehe
Sana may mayamang ipagbannga yung Fort at mga 1st world SUV. joke
Ito previous thread showing Fort being hit in the side by a jeepney. Tignan niyo, tibay naman. http://tsikot.com/forums/goon-squad-...ccident-24552/
Being hit in the bumper (thus chassis rigidity helps) is different than being hit above the bumpers as shown by the pics above. May factor din yun IMHO.Fasten your seatbelt! Or else... Driven To Thrill!
-
-
June 1st, 2011 01:16 PM #45
*foresterx
Yup no argument there bro. I agree that bigger isn't necessarily safer. The point I wanted to make was that given a head on collision between 2 cars with the same or similar crash ratings but different bumper/chassis levels (one being closer to the ground, one being significantly higher than the first), the car with the lower level from the ground will probably be less safer. Say like the Opel roadster I posted before vs the Volvo suv, both with similar crash rating scores. Hitting a stationary barrier the same level as your car is different from hitting something moving that would hit you at the level of your windshield. I personally wouldn't feel safe hitting a Fortuner head on with the same roadster despite the 4 star crash rating.
-
June 1st, 2011 01:56 PM #46
i agree with you if both have the same crash safety rating i'd rather be in the suv pero that depends din on what kind of suv. lets say my forester(which has a 5 star crash rating) is about to hit an mb s550 head on, i'd rather be on the s550 since yung kaha niya mas matigas kesa sa subaru.
but for me i'd rather be in a sedan that has a 5 star crash rating than an suv with out one. if there is a slight chance that i might survive in a fatal crash if i was on a safer car, then i'd take that chance no matter how small it is rather than have no chance at surviving at all.
-
June 1st, 2011 03:39 PM #47
The Fort's bumper is only at the same level as the engine bay of a roadster. It will still run into the crash structure instead of straight through the pillars.
A glancing blow to the windshield is not as strong as a head-on blow to the bumper. In other words, you're talking about someone's punch grazing your cheek versus hitting you square in the kisser. Which do you think will hurt more? Unless the car has 1980's pillars which shear off on impact, the A-pillars will be enough to deflect the force upward and away from the passenger cabin. That's why they're not concerned with a barrier impact straight to the windshield of a vehicle (because cars won't be hitting barriers there... trucks, maybe, but the law requires them to have lower bumpers now). This is also the same logic (supported by engineering data) that causes airbag triggers to ignore off-set blows or glancing crashes.
I wouldn't feel safe in a roadster because there's no roof triangulating the A-pillars. But a small car? Perfectly fine. As long as said small car has a 4 or 5 star rating, and is not an early 90's tin can or a utility van (HiAce/Urvan/L300 style) that crumples flat when hit by a bus.
Ang pagbalik ng comeback...
-
-
June 1st, 2011 05:31 PM #49
And yet, as you can see, the Lambo's roof holds.
You're talking about a car that's so low that you're looking up at guys riding in slammed Civics, with a front end that slopes down so low that even a Vios would ride over it in a crash.
Ang pagbalik ng comeback...
-
Choice I would have made as well.:nod:
2024 Innova Zenix 2.0 V CVT (non-HEV) vs Innova...