Results 1 to 10 of 15
-
July 24th, 2004 03:03 PM #1
Any feedback on this car?
Here are the features:
- 3.0 V6 VVTi 1MZ-FE Powerplant
- 212Hp * 5800rpm, 298 Nm of torque at 4400rpm
- 5 speed automatic transmission
- HID Projector Headlamps w/ auto-leveling function
- LED tail lamps
- 17" wheels on 215/55R17 tires
- leather seats, power adjustable seats for front and rear
- tri-color optitron instrumentation
- wood and leather trims
- 4-wheel ABS with EBD and Brake Assist
- dual front and side airbags
- whiplash protection headrests
All this for a measly Php1,680,000, looks like they're starting to bring in the bigger displacement engines. I wonder what the mileage of this baby is.
-
-
July 25th, 2004 04:01 PM #3
3.0 VVT-i. The engine will be smooth and torqy, lakas yan sa hatakan, even though its a VVT-i 3.0 malakas pa rin yan sa gas, especially when the egine crawls in manila traffic
V6 are meant for cruising speeds.
-
July 25th, 2004 05:34 PM #4
i would expect 5.0 km/L on average in the city, maybe up to 6.0 km/L if the car would consistently see only moderate traffic
-
July 26th, 2004 03:57 PM #5
Woah lakas nga, compared to the cefiro V6 which has the better engine. (I think mas maliit yung displacement ng cefiro V6)
-
July 26th, 2004 04:03 PM #6Originally posted by ILuvDetailing
Woah lakas nga, compared to the cefiro V6 which has the better engine. (I think mas maliit yung displacement ng cefiro V6)
-
Tsikot Member Rank 3
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Posts
- 551
July 26th, 2004 04:26 PM #7specs comparison
Camry
price P1.680
cc 2,995
engine V-6, 24V DOHC,
VVT-I
power 214.9ps/5,800
torque 30.3kg-m/4,400
trans. 5 a/t
brake 15" ventilated
disc front
14" disc rear
mags 17"
Cefiro
price P1.450
cc 2,988
engine V-6, 24V DOHC
power 220ps/6,400
torque 29.3kg-m/4,000
trans. 4 a/t
brake 11" ventilated
disc front
11 disc rear
mags 16"
copied from motoring inquirerLast edited by johnart; July 26th, 2004 at 05:00 PM.
-
July 26th, 2004 04:36 PM #8
No fuel mileage comparison? Well with the 220K price difference looks like the Cefiro has more value for your money.
-
July 26th, 2004 05:17 PM #9
fuel economy should be quite similar for both engines...
15.0" front and 14.0" rear discs... why does the camry have such huge-diameter discs (i thought it was marketing doublespeak, but car & driver confirmed the data)? i mean, those are larger than the Mosler MT900's and the Porsche 911 Turbo's! hehe
-
saw this old baby Pajero abandoned at the casa ( probably couldn't afford to pay for the services),...
Abandoned Cars