Results 41 to 50 of 128
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Posts
- 399
September 30th, 2012 11:32 AM #4150% agreeable, the rest of the 50% is debatable. They should have forseen this issue especially placing the entry and exit point of the underpass near one of the heavily used foot bridge in quezon avenue. Biggest test for this will be today on every end of the mass at sto domingo church. Aside from this, i also noticed some cars tends to the right to enter biak na bato street and battling their way with the PUJ while some pile up and occupanying 2 lanes at the u-turn slot. Mmda can easily correct this by prolonging the gutter/divider and close down the u-turn slot.
-
-
September 30th, 2012 12:33 PM #43
-
September 30th, 2012 12:50 PM #44
-
September 30th, 2012 12:54 PM #45
-
-
September 30th, 2012 01:24 PM #47
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Posts
- 399
September 30th, 2012 02:01 PM #48But still the we cant remove the mass transit system along quezon avenue for this underpass to be a sucessful project. This PUVs are like pest that cant be easily eliminated. The LRT1, LRT2 and MRT wasnt sucessful in eradicating the over numbered PUVs along their same routes taken.
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Posts
- 445
September 30th, 2012 02:04 PM #49
-
Na lock ang Gcash ko, need verification pa and kasama sa list nila ang philsys ID paper, but when I...
National ID Law