subaru impreza 2.0R Sport vs Lancer 2.0 gls???

**bulletweight** · February 7th, 2011 12:16 AM

i need some advice alin bang mas ok sa dalawa? sa performance niya saka gas consumption.. ano bang mas matulin sa kanila?

**aejhayl17** · February 7th, 2011 12:53 AM

the subaru will win in terms of performance but at the price of fuel consumption, afaik, its AWD making it much more heavier than the Lancer GLS, a FWD.

**ghosthunter** · February 7th, 2011 01:11 AM

Originally Posted by bulletweight

i need some advice alin bang mas ok sa dalawa? sa performance niya saka gas consumption.. ano bang mas matulin sa kanila?

The AWD on the Subaru Impreza 2.0R is overkill for its engine's output, but the car is fun to push to its performance boundaries. The AWD makes the tranny heavy. The A/T version is a wet-rag in terms of performance. If you are getting this car, make sure its a M/T.

The Lancer EX GLS is a good drive but lacks a few things to make it a better car. For one, the 16inch wheels makes the car "unsure" of it's handling. Changing to the 18inch wheels found on the GT/GTA cures that problem. Another thing, the GLS lacks the paddle shifters and rear stabilizer. The MX model has these and the price difference is not that big.

As for fuel consumption, the Lancer EX is better because it does not have to deal with the extra "load" of the AWD. The CVT in the Lancer EX makes driving it a smooth experience when driven softly, a quick accelerating monster when you floor the pedal.

**ghosthunter** · February 7th, 2011 01:24 AM

BTW, one thing about AWD cars, they have a center differential. In the case of the Impreza, limited slip diff. If your tires are not the same size (either by mismatched wheel size or different tire wear rates for front/rear) you can encounter problems when the center diff tries to lock and release.

This can also be a problem if you have a different sized spare tire. You have to keep speed very low and dont drive far.

**foresterx** · February 7th, 2011 10:27 AM

i agree with GH, the awd of the 2.0r is unnecesarry here in the philippines since we don't encouter snow or other severe road conditions. so it really is a disadvantage when it comes to regular driving since the FC is really bad because of it's awd. the only use of the 2.0r's awd here in the philippines is when it's raining hard and climbing up mountains since it lacks power. pero when it comes to build quality the 2.0r has a much better build quality than the lancer, it just feels more solid.

**bulletweight** · February 7th, 2011 10:48 AM

sa gas consumption nya mga ilang liter per km ng subaru? anong top speed ng subaru saka lancer?

tnx...

**foresterx** · February 7th, 2011 10:57 AM

Originally Posted by bulletweight

sa gas consumption nya mga ilang liter per km ng subaru? anong top speed ng subaru saka lancer?

tnx...

6-8km/ltr and 210kph ang impreza.

**bulletweight** · February 7th, 2011 11:20 AM

bos naka subaru kaba? talagang yun na top speed wala na ibibigay? tnx

**ghosthunter** · February 7th, 2011 11:31 AM

Originally Posted by bulletweight

sa gas consumption nya mga ilang liter per km ng subaru? anong top speed ng subaru saka lancer?

tnx...

Fuel consumption:

Subaru Impreza 2.0R
11.90 (MT, mfg.) 8.33 (MT, test) 12.20 (AT, mfg.) 8.33 (AT, test)

Mitsubishi Lancer EX GTA (GLS has same rated manufacturer's km/L)
10.20 (mfg.) 9.01 (test)

My Lancer EX GLS, I have cruised at 200kph on the SCTEX but that is not yet it's top speed.