Results 11 to 18 of 18
-
September 26th, 2009 01:48 AM #11
good explanation dude
once a retrovirus enters our body and integrates itself into our DNA, it's there forever
we can find traces of ancient human retroviral infections in our genes
there's an ancient retrovirus called HERV
it's in our DNALast edited by uls; September 26th, 2009 at 01:51 AM.
-
-
September 26th, 2009 07:54 AM #13I agree with everyone's viewpoint here that the best thing to do here is to abstinence pa rin talaga.
I've heard of a case where a donor was found to have a positive result during his ELISA screening. The donor complained that he just donated blood six months ago and it was negative then. Concerned, the head of the unit traced the patient's first donated blood.
When they tested the person whom they gave the blood to, positive din daw sya for HIV.
They think what happened was, the donor got the HIV/AIDS virus less then three months before he was screened during his blood donation. Ang screening for HIV kasi ang hinahanap ay yung antibodies natin sa HIV, e tumataas ang level nito within 2 to 12 weeks pa kaya pag mas maaga mo tinest, pwede sya maging false negative . That's the reason why we don't usually request it immediately after contact at pinapaulit namin ito at 6 months pag negative sa first 3 months.
Anyways, this case was just an anecdotal report; a colleague of mine told me he heard this during a convention he attended.
-
September 26th, 2009 08:20 AM #14
Hahaha...lol
Opppsss! Then it is better if the researchers are the one claiming that it is statistically significant. To us researchers... the significance of the result matters the most... all those previous numbers are disregarded and irrelevant once Statistical Significance is stablished. I could understand the importance of those numbers if they want to double/quadruple check if the Statistical Significance is correct though.
That is the point of computing whether the numbers gathered are statistically significant or not.... you have to remember the 0.3 percent you mentioned is a representative of the entire population... it might be a small percentage but it probably equates to a humongous number.
Sorry...about that. I might have read too fast and misunderstood. Excellent explanation though.
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 4,459
September 26th, 2009 08:24 AM #15Is it a problem to wear a rubber? And to not have *** with "workers" or anyone you don't really know well?
Just keep your mating activities within your circle para safe and don't pay for ***.
-
September 26th, 2009 08:36 AM #16
-
September 26th, 2009 09:39 AM #17
-
February 21st, 2023 05:29 PM #18
not a vaccine... but this thread is the only AIDS topic under the Health Forum
***
5th person confirmed to be cured of HIV | Yahoo! News
Referred to as "the Dusseldorf patient" to protect his privacy, researchers said he is the fifth confirmed case of an HIV cure. Although the details of his successful treatment were first announced at a conference in 2019, researchers could not confirm he had been officially cured at that time.
Today, researchers announced the Dusseldorf patient still has no detectable virus in his body, even after stopping his HIV medication four years ago.
Be careful with channels like "China Observer" on YouTube. There is a clear bias in their posts and...
Xiaomi E-Car