so during the large scale clinical trials Sanofi can't test every single one of the millions of kids and just used age 9 as the minimum assuming that by age 9 na-infect na (in dengue prevalent countries like PH)
syempre there will be those who haven't been infected yet but Sanofi took the risk nalang
maybe they thought the numbers would be small
a few deaths can be acceptable
uls,
putol!
puede mo bang i-paste yung entire message?
ah. ok na. i just googled it. unang-unang pa...
i think what they were saying was,
the study was not designed to prove or disprove ADE...
but my thoughts, as well as others', was that the evidence was there, and should have warranted a closer look...
Last edited by dr. d; July 17th, 2019 at 11:41 AM.
there's a separate thread for this
Dengue Vaccine by 2016
i posted this in 2017
![]()
while it can safely be predicted that the vaccine does work on a historical basis (translation: it saves much more than it kills),
"that knowledge is not comforting at all, when it is one's child on the hospital bed, suffering from the vaccine's ill-effects".
while it seems nice that "it saved a potential 500 thousand children", it just seems immoral, that it killed a few hundred children in its negative effect...
history is impersonal, and can judge accordingly.
but we humans are too personal to let it pass..
Last edited by dr. d; July 17th, 2019 at 12:05 PM.
you are correct.
i suppose, it would depend, on whether one is an odds-maker, or a physician.
OT.
there is this saying, phrased by another medical person,
"the doctor is the only professional who is not allowed to make a mistake. i can not think of anyone who can live like that."
Last edited by dr. d; July 17th, 2019 at 12:18 PM.
madami naman vaccine na effective na safe
ung mga childhood vaccines natin
kakaiba lang itong dengue
pero pilit gumawa ng vaccine kasi malaki ang potential na kita
kokontratahin mo lahat ng gobyerno ng dengue-prevalent countries for mass vaccination
$$$$$$$
--
itong large scale clinical trial ng sanofi binayaran pa ng gobyerno natin
dapat libre yan kasi clinical trial
ginawang mass vaccination program ang clinical trial
Last edited by uls; July 17th, 2019 at 12:29 PM.
according to DOH, tumaas ang incidence of vaccinate-able infectious disease, traced to the public's fear of the dengue vaccine, translating into fear and rejection of the other traditional vaccines.
ang deparment of health and food drugs adminstration eh masahol pa sa customs yan.
ultimo nga sukang-puti walang kamalay-malay na acetic acid pala.
Yung mga bakuna nung sina-unang panahon ang intention eh makaligtas ng buhay.
Ngayon eh paano makakubra muna.
dok,
for dengvaxia = noynoy & janet garin.
sa acetic acid = charade puno
our top leaders have advisers.
but if the advisers give bad advice...
who gets blamed?
who should get blamed?
medical science is not as black and white as we might wish it to be.
in a nebulous world, anything can happen.
but in the medical field, "first do no harm".
easy to type. easier to wish for.
hideously impossible to accomplish at times.
my colleague said,
"the evidence was there. all one had to do, was it pick it up and recognize it for what it was."
OT.
if denggoyvaxia delivered on its hype, what will this thread be containing?
there's also the dizzying swiftness of events.. sabi nga ng isang matagal na sa gubyerno..."considering the amount of moneys involved...napaka-bilis!"
Last edited by dr. d; July 17th, 2019 at 01:17 PM.