New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 48

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    27,624
    #1
    Camry 2.5 6AT on a relatively flat area.

    0-60kph: 5.51s
    0-100kph: 10.43

    App name: Ulysse Speedometer Pro



    notes: brake torque only resulted to bad times [emoji28] tires lost traction

    Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

  2. Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    727
    #2
    Very good numbers sir! Is the app accurate based on the birthsheet?

    Sent from my ASUS_Z012D using Tapatalk

  3. Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    27,624
    #3
    It was close to this Camry 2.5 8AT(video below) I ran 5 times. and it was bang on. a little slower probably because the elevation was 1200m above sea level. The 8sp is nuts 0-60kph!

    https://youtu.be/PKZup6_WeZA

    Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

  4. Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    88
    #4


    Edit:
    0-60 5.17s
    0-100 12.49s

    The everest and montero has about the same time.

  5. Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    88
    #5
    The Civic 1.8 CVT is just sad:

  6. Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    17,314
    #6
    Quote Originally Posted by kebloks View Post
    The Civic 1.8 CVT is just sad:
    Why? The 10 second 0-100 time is better than previous AT Civics and most other mid-trim compacts.

    Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

  7. Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    27,624
    #7
    Quote Originally Posted by jut703 View Post
    Why? The 10 second 0-100 time is better than previous AT Civics and most other mid-trim compacts.

    Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
    he drives a faster car siguro[emoji848]

    ill test the civic pag uwi ko [emoji16]

    Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

  8. Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    27,624
    #8
    bro you can link youtube but thread is meant for actual results

    Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

  9. Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    12,608
    #9
    Quote Originally Posted by StockEngine View Post
    Camry 2.5 6AT on a relatively flat area.

    0-60kph: 5.51s
    0-100kph: 10.43

    App name: Ulysse Speedometer Pro



    notes: brake torque only resulted to bad times [emoji28] tires lost traction

    Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
    I will try the app and test it against our rides.

  10. Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    27,624
    #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Egan101 View Post
    I will try the app and test it against our rides.
    lakas siguro ng fiesta eb sa 0-60 [emoji3]

    Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

  11. Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    12,608
    #11
    Quote Originally Posted by StockEngine View Post
    lakas siguro ng fiesta eb sa 0-60 [emoji3]

    Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
    Naah, it is just below 10s on my count for 0-100kmh. Nothing to be excited about but still quicker than most compacts and subcompacts.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Last edited by Egan101; March 23rd, 2018 at 07:54 PM.

  12. Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    27,624
    #12
    Quote Originally Posted by Egan101 View Post
    Naah, it is just there around, just below 10s on my count. Nothing to be excited about but still quicker than most compacts and subcompacts.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    0-60kph hindi mph

    Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

  13. Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    12,608
    #13
    Quote Originally Posted by StockEngine View Post
    0-60kph hindi mph

    Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
    I will try that 0-60kmh with a watch first.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  14. Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    12,608
    #14
    Quote Originally Posted by StockEngine View Post
    0-60kph hindi mph

    Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
    Did something earlier after the toll booth arms raised to let me pass. It was around 6+ seconds from 0-60kmh on the stopwatch.

    I will try the FXT tomorrow using the app as I have just installed it. Will do another test on the Fiesta next week.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Last edited by Egan101; March 23rd, 2018 at 11:08 PM.

  15. Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    12,608
    #15
    Quote Originally Posted by kawkaw123 View Post
    I now own a 2011 BMW 320D M Sport and I managed to get it from 0-100kph in around 7.6 seconds. Is that considered slow?

    Also what do you own? And how long does your car take from 0-100kph?
    That’s good enough. You can’t expect something better. The BMW 328i 2.0L turbo gas is quicker though. If you want a much quicker BMW, get an M5 or M3.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  16. Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,328
    #16
    Quote Originally Posted by Egan101 View Post
    That’s good enough. You can’t expect something better. The BMW 328i 2.0L turbo gas is quicker though. If you want a much quicker BMW, get an M5 or M3.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    I had a quick early morning spirited drive against an STi using my XT on Aguinaldo highway before.

    I was the one in front, i can't gap him but he can't overtake me either. It was like a touge battle for maybe around 10 minutes. Sadly, i have to take my exit and slowed down for him to pass. He then flashed his headlights at me, which i did as well when he passed me acknowledging the fun and mutual respect we both had for each other.

    He needs to extract every horsepower he can to pass me, and me on the other hand, need to use every single 230 horses i have to prevent him from passing me.

    My point is, horsepower figures do not mean much in real world driving. Unless it's a straight open road in which the higher hp car can go flat out, we with the lesser hp cars can definitely give him a run for his money. hehe

  17. Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    8
    #17
    Quote Originally Posted by BlancNoir View Post
    I had a quick early morning spirited drive against an STi using my XT on Aguinaldo highway before.

    I was the one in front, i can't gap him but he can't overtake me either. It was like a touge battle for maybe around 10 minutes. Sadly, i have to take my exit and slowed down for him to pass. He then flashed his headlights at me, which i did as well when he passed me acknowledging the fun and mutual respect we both had for each other.

    He needs to extract every horsepower he can to pass me, and me on the other hand, need to use every single 230 horses i have to prevent him from passing me.

    My point is, horsepower figures do not mean much in real world driving. Unless it's a straight open road in which the higher hp car can go flat out, we with the lesser hp cars can definitely give him a run for his money. hehe
    True. That's because most manufacturers only advertise the peak hp/tq values. It would help if we can see the power curve so we'd know what the power looks like across the entire rpm range. Then factor in the weight + transmission to closely predict which car would have an edge. But then again, dyno sheets mean very little unless they're done in the same exact location/day as there are many variables that may affect the results.

    Also some German brands such as bmw and audi often underrate their engines. Nissan, for instance, the first time I saw them underrating their engine is with the VR30DDTT - except maybe for the skylines but that has a different story back then. It's actually good to see they're expanding this TT v6 to the nissan line up starting with the upcoming Z. That'll go head-to-head with the current "zupra." Honda will soon release their TT v6 starting with their acura line. Technically, they have one but in NSX. I doubt they'll put that on their mass-produced models. They're running a little late in the TT game btw.

    The STi is quick but not really that fast on straight. It's better suited on track though.

  18. Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    727
    #18
    Is that the free app or yun may bayad?

    Sent from my ASUS_Z012D using Tapatalk

  19. Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    6,160
    #19
    Thats a paid app.

    In my experience 6 secs to 100kmh feels brisk but not really fast (mini cooper JCW). Good enough to over take easily but not really anything home to write about.

    5ish secs to 100kmh (tuned Audi Q5 ) feels sprightly and fun. I think this is the crossover point for when speed starts to mean anything.

    High 4 ish secs to 100kmh (mustang, lexus LC500) is fast but not scary fast. Probably would wish for more.

    Low 4ish to high 3ish secs to 100kmh (audi RS5) is fast but not roller coaster gravity fast. This is now my minimum acceleration requirement if ever i will get a fast car. But the truth is medyo bitin pa rin.

    2.9 secs to 100kmh (Nissan GT R) is very fast and you have to damn well not look at the speedometer to keep your car on the road. There are faster cars but this is the limit of my capability to handle.

    I never drove one but rode shotgun in a 560+hp awd lambo before. Now that was freakin scary . Acceleration in gear was truly hairy. No turbo lag. The GTR falls short of that experience because of the turbo lag.

    Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk Pro
    Last edited by EQAddict; March 23rd, 2018 at 01:48 PM.

  20. Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    12,608
    #20
    Quote Originally Posted by EQAddict View Post
    Thats a paid app.

    In my experience 6 secs to 100kmh feels brisk but not really fast (mini cooper JCW). Good enough to over take easily but not really anything home to write about.

    5ish secs to 100kmh (tuned Audi Q5 ) feels sprightly and fun. I think this is the crossover point for when speed starts to mean anything.

    High 4 ish secs to 100kmh (mustang, lexus LC500) is fast but not scary fast. Probably would wish for more.

    Low 4ish to high 3ish secs to 100kmh (audi RS5) is fast but not roller coaster gravity fast. This is now my minimum acceleration requirement if ever i will get a fast car. But the truth is medyo bitin pa rin.

    2.9 secs to 100kmh (Nissan GT R) is very fast and you have to damn well not look at the speedometer to keep your car on the road. There are faster cars but this is the limit of my capability to handle.

    I never drove one but rode shotgun in a 560+hp awd lambo before. Now that was freakin scary . Acceleration in gear was truly hairy. No turbo lag. The GTR falls short of that experience because of the turbo lag.

    Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk Pro
    With your scale above, the WRX is just at the low end together with some of common quick rides (Passat 2.0T, Accord 3.5L). Most 1.6L NA compacts or PPVs can't even do 10 seconds.

    The new ubersedans (M5, E63S) are rated over 600hp and can hit 60mph in less than 3 seconds. These Germans just want their rides to go freakin' fast! I guess that would satisfy my need for quickness, luxury, and comfort.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Acceleration Times: 0-60kph & 0-100kph