Results 41 to 50 of 73
-
January 11th, 2009 02:39 PM #41
But if they do not lend out money, large amounts of deposits are a burden to them coz they have to pay interest on the deposits
banks rent depositors' money
they use depositors' money to pull in more money so they can pay depositors the rental fee (interest) and they keep the rest as profit
if they are not making loans, where will they get the money to pay interest?
now they are just sitting on huge piles of cash
they just buy US treasuries that earn 2%Last edited by uls; January 11th, 2009 at 02:53 PM.
-
January 11th, 2009 03:00 PM #42
yes. this is why banks are primarily allowed to engage in financing or lending a portion of the bulk of the deposits to the public so that they can also generate profits.
on the other side of the relationship, it is one of a debtor and creditor (obligee-obligor)thing. the depositor lends cash to the bank and the bank in turn gives out to the public in the concept of loan. the difference is that, in ordinary deposit, the depositor (obligor) can get the deposit at will. whereas, in loans extended by the banks, the same need to have a term, and the bank can't just collect until it's due and demandable; likewise, the banks don't extend unsecure debts, as a general rule.
-
January 11th, 2009 03:18 PM #43
ab intio, thanks for the textbook explanation of what banks do
but that's not the issue
if you backread, i was just disagreeing with OB's, i mean, Gen.Miting's post where he said:
whenever there is a crisis or a looming crisis, the banks tend to benefit from the situation. the fear and paranoia makes people want to spend less and save more and therefore, all-time high in record deposits.
i posted an article to back up my disagreement
the article says banks' profits are falling during this crisis
despite having more of deposits, banks are not making more money these days
they are actually making less money coz they are lending out less money
that's itLast edited by uls; January 11th, 2009 at 03:25 PM.
-
January 11th, 2009 04:58 PM #44
^^ i see. thank you, Sir.
my comment is limited to your post. just take my post in the light of your comments, Sir.
was just too lazy to backread. wehehe.
-
January 12th, 2009 09:43 AM #45i think you're talking about the wild wild west type of banks. so 18th century thinking hehehe
JPM, BoA, Wells Fargo, Citigroup -- wild wild west pala sila
one of us is not in touch with reality... and it's not me
--
you talk like sitting in huge piles of cash is a big big problem
the biggest banks in the US, UK, EU are not lending
companies are going bankrupt, people are losing their jobs
it's affecting the whole world
that's a big problemLast edited by uls; January 12th, 2009 at 09:56 AM.
-
January 12th, 2009 10:37 AM #46
^^
excess reserves
in order to protect against unexpected withdrawals, banks are required to maintain a certain level of reserves
anything beyond that level is classified as excess reserves
the chart above shows US banks have huge amounts of excess reserves (NOT LENDING)
they are HOARDING cash
and look at what's happening to the US economy
and how it is affecting the world
so yes, sitting on huge piles of cash IS a big big problem
--
i got stuff to back up my opinions
OB, i hope you would do the sameLast edited by uls; January 12th, 2009 at 10:40 AM.
-
January 12th, 2009 07:53 PM #47
Guys, you're falling for OB's trap.
His MO is to make controversial, illogical or hare-brained statements to bait you to react and reply to his post. Once you have done so, he'll engage you in a spirited debate which predictably leads to nowhere.
Stop feeding the troll, and just ignore him.
-
January 12th, 2009 08:01 PM #48
-
January 13th, 2009 02:50 AM #49
-
January 13th, 2009 08:12 AM #50
tinamaan din pharmaceutical industry. nagbawas ng employees ang Roche, Schering P., tapos nagsara na ang Bristol Myers Squibb.
Be careful with channels like "China Observer" on YouTube. There is a clear bias in their posts and...
Xiaomi E-Car