New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines



View Poll Results: Senate's verdict on CJ

Voters
69. You may not vote on this poll
  • Guilty!

    58 84.06%
  • Not Guilty

    9 13.04%
  • i couldn't care less

    2 2.90%
Page 242 of 421 FirstFirst ... 142192232238239240241242243244245246252292342 ... LastLast
Results 2,411 to 2,420 of 4205
  1. Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    965
    #2411
    Wow, ang kapal ng mukha ni Lacson! Quoting the Constitution to Justice Cuevas, para daw "magabayan" sya ni Lacson!

  2. Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    26,770
    #2412
    Jinggoy reiterating the 45 properties divulge by the prosecution to the media. But only 24 properties in actual inclduing 3 parking space.

  3. Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    965
    #2413
    Atat na atat din naman 'tong mga senador na 'to.

  4. Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    98
    #2414
    marami palang source of income si CJ. akala ko ba hindi pwede ang double compensation sa government officials..

  5. Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    76
    #2415
    hintayin na lang matapos presentation ng defense

  6. Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    965
    #2416
    Quote Originally Posted by e-bundok View Post
    marami palang source of income si CJ. akala ko ba hindi pwede ang double compensation sa government officials..
    Talk with your local representative or send a letter to the senators to have them change the law, so people in government don't get all of these allowances and per diems

  7. Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    1,326
    #2417
    Quote Originally Posted by umi001 View Post
    Talk with your local representative or send a letter to the senators to have them change the law, so people in government don't get all of these allowances and per diems

    sa mga ganoong "tax exempt" benefits... I think, pupuwedeng questionin yan.. although ang question dapat dyan, either BIR, or say, Congress... but since the 3 branches "respect" each other... need a precedent siguro for that to happen..

    sa pagkaka alam ko.. tax exemptions should be explicitly mentioned in law... so.. depende kung saan o alin ang basehan ng mga nabanggit na mga allowances na yung ng Judiciary... maaari may basis na tax exempt yun.. pero kung talagang walang explicit exemption provided for by law... questionable nga...

  8. Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    1,326
    #2418
    Quote Originally Posted by e-bundok View Post
    marami palang source of income si CJ. akala ko ba hindi pwede ang double compensation sa government officials..


    not sure if a law somewhere provides a distinction between passive income and active income...

    pero.. kung all income inclusive.. nararapat lang na malaki ang pay / salary... di naman siguro masama kung malaki ang income ng judge, gayong bawal sya mag karoon ng ibang negosyo / income source...

    also wondering.. while there is a provision for divesting sa ibang executive positions (President, VP, etc)... di ko sure kung divesting lang ng assets.. or pati income sources dapat i divest... sa Executive din dapat ganoon.. pero ganoon din ba ang nangyayari? sa Congress... dapat full time congressman din sila... ganoon din ba ang nangyayari??

  9. Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,828
    #2419
    Ay nako binasura na nga yung article 2.4 eh.

    Immaterial tong mga witness ng defense.

  10. Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    354
    #2420
    Quote Originally Posted by CoDer View Post
    Ay nako binasura na nga yung article 2.4 eh.

    Immaterial tong mga witness ng defense.
    delaying tactics of the defense team..

Impeachment against CJ Corona..