Impeachment against CJ Corona..

[e-bundok]

subtle line of questioning but goes deep to the core on the avenues for corruption. dami pala perks si haring CJ.

[Retz]

tapos na ang cross. prosecutor judge drilon now questioning the witness.

[greenlyt]

sir highlights naman ng cross examination....

[yapoy86]

pwede ba sabihin corruption yan kung approved naman yan mga benefits na yan... lalo na lahat ng justices eh naka receive ng ganyan benefits...

[chrismarte]

ablay daw si trillanes? ano ginawa?

[e-bundok]

pwede ba sabihin corruption yan kung approved naman yan mga benefits na yan... lalo na lahat ng justices eh naka receive ng ganyan benefits...

good point. pero they can always give any form of monetary receivable a name and make it sound a legitimate benefit. makes one wonder why one government agency has a different set of benefits from another. or even within the same functional agency, the head honcho has more nice-ringing-named benefits than the ordinary employee.

[Retz]

Ung mga allownaces, benefits should be liquidated and accounted for. It should not be included in the salary income of cheap justice corona. Minus mo pa ang mga daily and monthly expenses niya. Still, hindi pa rin mag tally yan sa SALN.

[Retz]

hindi kaya si drilon ang talagang lead prosecutor at nagbabalatkayo lang na senator judge?

[shadow]

mahihirapan makalusot Si corona

[shadow]

income pinakita ng defense, Wala ba sila papakita expenses ni corona para makita kung lahat nun na received niya from SC eh hinde niya nagamit?

[umi001]

Wow, ang kapal ng mukha ni Lacson! Quoting the Constitution to Justice Cuevas, para daw "magabayan" sya ni Lacson!

[Retz]

Jinggoy reiterating the 45 properties divulge by the prosecution to the media. But only 24 properties in actual inclduing 3 parking space.

[umi001]

Atat na atat din naman 'tong mga senador na 'to.

[e-bundok]

marami palang source of income si CJ. akala ko ba hindi pwede ang double compensation sa government officials..

[acedal]

hintayin na lang matapos presentation ng defense

[umi001]

marami palang source of income si CJ. akala ko ba hindi pwede ang double compensation sa government officials..

Talk with your local representative or send a letter to the senators to have them change the law, so people in government don't get all of these allowances and per diems

[wowiesy]

Talk with your local representative or send a letter to the senators to have them change the law, so people in government don't get all of these allowances and per diems

sa mga ganoong "tax exempt" benefits... I think, pupuwedeng questionin yan.. although ang question dapat dyan, either BIR, or say, Congress... but since the 3 branches "respect" each other... need a precedent siguro for that to happen..

sa pagkaka alam ko.. tax exemptions should be explicitly mentioned in law... so.. depende kung saan o alin ang basehan ng mga nabanggit na mga allowances na yung ng Judiciary... maaari may basis na tax exempt yun.. pero kung talagang walang explicit exemption provided for by law... questionable nga...

[wowiesy]

marami palang source of income si CJ. akala ko ba hindi pwede ang double compensation sa government officials..

not sure if a law somewhere provides a distinction between passive income and active income...

pero.. kung all income inclusive.. nararapat lang na malaki ang pay / salary... di naman siguro masama kung malaki ang income ng judge, gayong bawal sya mag karoon ng ibang negosyo / income source...

also wondering.. while there is a provision for divesting sa ibang executive positions (President, VP, etc)... di ko sure kung divesting lang ng assets.. or pati income sources dapat i divest... sa Executive din dapat ganoon.. pero ganoon din ba ang nangyayari? sa Congress... dapat full time congressman din sila... ganoon din ba ang nangyayari??

[CoDer]

Ay nako binasura na nga yung article 2.4 eh.

Immaterial tong mga witness ng defense.

[black ice]

Ay nako binasura na nga yung article 2.4 eh.

Immaterial tong mga witness ng defense.

delaying tactics of the defense team..