Results 21 to 30 of 41
-
October 19th, 2010 09:35 AM #21
-
BANNED BANNED BANNED
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Posts
- 2,267
October 19th, 2010 10:11 AM #22that's good to hear.
but going back to the topic of this thread, weather forecasting and communication among agencies are two different but related issues.
i think the issue with with PAGASA and Nilo is the wrong forecasts, hence the sacking.
we basically have two school of thoughts regarding the issue - PAGASA lack the equipment OR the head (Nilo) isn't capable as a leader (or probably both).
it is really too early which is which. this typhoon while very strong did not exhibit that very unpredictable behavior that caused Nilo's sacking.
on a side note, a lot of facebook friends are actually getting the weather forecasts for the Philippines from other countries (Japan or HK etc). maybe Pnoy is right after all. we don't need expensive equipment. we just need a fast and reliable internet connection and copy whatever forecasts other countries have for our country.
-
-
October 19th, 2010 11:08 AM #24
alisin lang pala ng isang tao at magiging accurate na ang forecasting ng PAGASA!
-
October 19th, 2010 04:46 PM #25
The problem is the predictions were approximate, and it wasn't till late in the day that the typhoon's path became definite. (Yeah, I remember that day all too well).
PAGASA was screwed by its outdated 6-hour forecast system and their lack of internets.
-
Yes, they could rely on foreign services, like you and I did, but then... how would that bolster their case for the need for more funding?
Ang pagbalik ng comeback...
-
October 19th, 2010 07:32 PM #26
I wonder kung bibigyan ng credits ni Aquino si Arroyo since procurement of doppler radars happened under GMA
-
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Posts
- 421
October 19th, 2010 08:45 PM #28The problem with nilo and some of his staff is they failed to properly understand the gravity of the situation and communicate , they were too technical. First they failed to understand that when a typhoon veers to a different course, you don't wait 6 hours to announce it, you say it immediately esp. when it's going to a densely populated area. Also most of their forecast is "Heavy rains and strong wind" It fails to answer how heavy is heavy, if you look at the pagasa site, it doesn't give that much visual clue on the status of the weather and the dams unlike sites like wunderground.com where the visual representation of the status of the weather is better communicated
-
BANNED BANNED BANNED
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Posts
- 2,267
October 19th, 2010 08:55 PM #29
-
October 19th, 2010 10:54 PM #30
in fairness to PAGASA, bec of the incident gumanda na ang announcement nila with Typhoon Juan.
Be careful with channels like "China Observer" on YouTube. There is a clear bias in their posts and...
Xiaomi E-Car