Results 11 to 20 of 22
-
May 13th, 2010 12:34 PM #11
-
May 13th, 2010 01:03 PM #12
-
May 13th, 2010 01:04 PM #13
hehe
no comment ako ngayon dito
all i can say about Smartmatic is -- if you have a hold-departure order on your ass, you better not screw up
-
May 13th, 2010 01:20 PM #14
I'm not buying it.
Comelec hackers? Those guys can barely even provide a good website for themselves, and as we all know majority of the employees there are old fashioned people. The government isn't really good in procuring the right people for IT projects most of the time. NBI could barely even catch "hackers".
Obviously Smartmatic really blundered on the flash cards. No project manager would have wanted something like that to happen, especially with the logistical nightmare that comes with it.
They simply overlooked the difference of the formatting of the new ballots since they were still basically using the old vertical sample ballots with no double-spacing every time they would do a demonstration.
They had enough people working the hours to be able to reconfigure the flash cards, so it wasn't really surprising.
A lot of those IT/security know-it-alls had been talking before the elections about cheating and vulnerability crap. Well, all they did was talk, talk, and talk.Last edited by kotiko; May 13th, 2010 at 01:26 PM.
-
May 13th, 2010 01:32 PM #15
-
May 13th, 2010 01:45 PM #16
kung totoo nga ito, it was a brilliant strategy to corrupt-proof the machines. . .naisahan ang comelec
thumbs up to smartmatic!. . .kung totoo, ha
-
May 13th, 2010 02:05 PM #17
you mean mga scenario
hindi po
hindi ko po naisip na pwede planado ng Smartmatic ang last-minute change of memory cards
and i don't think anyone here thought of that before the elections
ikaw po ba naisip mo yun? (di ko maalala)
things are always clearer AFTER things happen
you can only understand an event perfectly AFTER the event happened
it's called 20/20 hindsight
in hindsight, magaling ang Smartmatic
they were able to pull off the gig
-
May 13th, 2010 02:41 PM #18
-
May 13th, 2010 04:37 PM #19
IMO, it was not overlooked.
The alibi of not having the 2nd page not in proper coding was unacceptable to any software developers. It raises a lot of eyebrows, knowing that a finished product would still have to pass QA/Test team and User acceptance testing before being deployed.
All we can conclude that day was it was an alibi to cover up security issues.
A lot of those IT/security know-it-alls had been talking before the elections about cheating and vulnerability crap. Well, all they did was talk, talk, and talk
-
May 13th, 2010 05:14 PM #20
If it was true, then it was a pretty good strategy by Smartmatic.
However, you can't use the same ruse 3 years from now when elections will once again come to fore.
Be careful with channels like "China Observer" on YouTube. There is a clear bias in their posts and...
Xiaomi E-Car