New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 247

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    2,566
    #1
    uy di ako maka GMA ha .. pero kung pagbabasehan ang law ano nga ba ang tama

    sana kasi noon pa nag file ng kaso para di nakahanap ng butas si GMA ngayon

    pero up to now wla pa formal na kaso na naisampa.


    ngayon mas mataas ba si De Lima kaysa sa SC?

    just asking peeepzz.. mga lawyer dyan labas labas na kayo para maliwanagan

  2. Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    2,209
    #2
    sabi ni de lima di pa nila nakukuha officially yung TRO announcement ng SC. parang tama lang.

  3. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    40,599
    #3
    kasing dami ng lawyers ang interpretation sa batas...

    kung hinde si Corona sa mga tuta ni GMA ang nasa SC..pwede..kaso wala ng credibility ang SC...

  4. Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    25,189
    #4
    May clause na "immediate and executory" sa Supreme Court TRO. De Lima interpretation is the Supreme Court must listen to her oral argument/pleading before she understands what "immediate and executory" means... Its like making an argument when the referee already made a decision.

  5. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    40,599
    #5
    ^tama naman eh. bakit pa magkaroon ng oral arguments eh para ano pa? why don;t SC listen first doon sa oral arguments ng both sides before rendering a decision...??? alam na!!!

    saka sus naman ang dami daming ng lumabas na TRO from CA, SC etc..pero laging sinasabi ng mga lawyers na hanggat walang final rulings eh hinde pa executory..meron pang MR etc...tapos ngayon biglang mababago...depende talaga ang interpretataion ng law kung kanino in favor...

    corona+GMA+SC=0 Delima+Penoy+executive=1 next

  6. Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    45,927
    #6
    wala na kwenta supreme court

    wala na credibility

    you can get away with not obeying SC decisions pala eh

    so from here on every SC decision is only a suggestion, no need to comply

    so lalo wala kwenta lahat ng courts lower than SC

    yehey!

    street justice nalang

    gonna be good business for goons and hired killers

    wala na kwenta ang law school

    wala na kwenta ang lawyers

    anarchy rules

  7. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    40,599
    #7
    then it's time for the SC to show who's in charge...kaya ba nila? pahuli na nila si De lima

    ayun nagmamadaling mag special en banc bukas, pwede naman pala masmaaga eh,...if they just hold on to their decision after the oral arguments walang ganitong gulo...

    they have themselves to blame...obvious kasi na tuta yun otso-otso ni GMA eh

    busted tuloy SC na walang power... co equal branch ha...

    pero maganda ngayon abangan, nag file ng cease and desist order sa SC sila GMA against DOJ and BI from stopping them to fly out...

    maglalabas kaya ang SC or they have learned their lessons or susundin ba ng DOJ?

  8. Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,829
    #8
    Quote Originally Posted by jansky View Post
    uy di ako maka GMA ha .. pero kung pagbabasehan ang law ano nga ba ang tama

    sana kasi noon pa nag file ng kaso para di nakahanap ng butas si GMA ngayon

    pero up to now wla pa formal na kaso na naisampa.


    ngayon mas mataas ba si De Lima kaysa sa SC?

    just asking peeepzz.. mga lawyer dyan labas labas na kayo para maliwanagan
    Problem is railroaded ang TRO. Wala atang oral argment if my memory serves me right. Correct me if I'm wrong.

    All of those who voted in favor of the TRO are actually GMA's appointee. And Corona???

  9. Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    787
    #9
    The objectionable part of the SC's move is that they issued a TRO that may cause irreparable injury to the Filipino people without listening to the arguments on both sides. The TRO will allow Arroyo to leave permanently.

    Why didn't Corona and his Court cohorts rule on the constitutionality of the WLO first before allowing Arroyo to leave? To paraphrase a famous saying: There's no use closing the barn door when the horse has already bolted. Corona and his cohorts clearly want to allow the horse to bolt before they decide whether the barn door should be closed or not.

  10. Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    25,189
    #10
    GMA is afterall publicly prejudged c/o PNoy vendetta. Remember that a GMA great escape is a BIG IF... In the PNOY's law, it is better to presume a crime yet to be commited, it is for GMA to prove otherwise. I wonder how will GMA look in orange w/ the kneck brace... and if PNoy will let her stay in a hospital arrest like ERAP.

  11. Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    8,452
    #11
    Tama yun sinabi ni Escudero. Dapat talaga kinasuhan na nila noon yang si GMA para walang ligtas. Eh hindi pa naman nila kinakasuhan formally sa courts eh. Puro lang naman trial by publicity ang ating student council government. Ngayon, nakahanap ng bala si GMA laban sa kanila kaya watch out lang ngayon ang student council, lalo na si matabil-bil na madaldal na De Lima.

    Nabasa ko rin sa FB ang post ni Atty. Raymond Fortun, na no matter what is the decision of the court, he as an officer of the law should abide to it. Hindi na question dito kung sino nagluklok sa SC, ang mahalaga dito, sundin ang decision.

    SC > DOJ

    Kaso...

    De Lima > SC?

    :hammer:

  12. Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    2,566
    #12
    pero sa ginagawa ni De Lima pde daw mag file ng political asylum si GMA sa ibang bansa



    From Atty. Raymond Fortun

    I never liked the Arroyo's. They trumped up the charges against Erap so they can seize power illegally. People don't know this, but the Erap camp was told that he would be convicted and THEN pardoned --- in OCTOBER 2003 or more than 3 years before he was IN FACT convicted and pardoned. Incidentally, all those justices (except 1) who convicted him were appointed to the Supreme Court -- by Gloria Arroyo. *whistle whistle

    But that being said, and with all due respect, i'm against De Lima's stand to defy the Supreme Court order to allow GMA to leave. De Lima is a lawyer, an 'officer of the Court', and she is bound under her lawyer's oath to give due respect to the Court and be an instrument for people to respect the Court -- even if the latter is (in her opinion) wrong.

    Law students nowadays are learning how erroneous the Supreme Court was in declaring that Erap had "constructively resigned" (a non-existent ground in our Constitution to remove a sitting President) in 2001 and legitimized GMA's reign. But you did not see me ranting and raving about the injustice. The most that i said in interviews was, "I have a contrary opinion about the issue, but i am an officer of the court so i am duty-bound to respect the Court's order."

    As the Erap illegal ouster has created a monster that is GMA, the De Lima defiance of the Supreme Court may create a bigger monster -- A POSSIBLE ANARCHY WHEN PEOPLE START THINKING THAT THEY CAN DEFY COURT ORDERS AND STILL GET AWAY WITH IT.

  13. Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    45,927
    #13
    Quote Originally Posted by jansky View Post
    As the Erap illegal ouster has created a monster that is GMA, the De Lima defiance of the Supreme Court may create a bigger monster -- A POSSIBLE ANARCHY WHEN PEOPLE START THINKING THAT THEY CAN DEFY COURT ORDERS AND STILL GET AWAY WITH IT.
    like me said:
    wala na kwenta supreme court

    wala na credibility

    you can get away with not obeying SC decisions pala eh

    so from here on every SC decision is only a suggestion, no need to comply

    so lalo wala kwenta lahat ng courts lower than SC

    yehey!

    street justice nalang

    gonna be good business for goons and hired killers

    wala na kwenta ang law school

    wala na kwenta ang lawyers

    anarchy rules

  14. Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    3,221
    #14
    Quote Originally Posted by jansky View Post
    pero sa ginagawa ni De Lima pde daw mag file ng political asylum si GMA sa ibang bansa



    From Atty. Raymond Fortun

    I never liked the Arroyo's. They trumped up the charges against Erap so they can seize power illegally. People don't know this, but the Erap camp was told that he would be convicted and THEN pardoned --- in OCTOBER 2003 or more than 3 years before he was IN FACT convicted and pardoned. Incidentally, all those justices (except 1) who convicted him were appointed to the Supreme Court -- by Gloria Arroyo. *whistle whistle

    But that being said, and with all due respect, i'm against De Lima's stand to defy the Supreme Court order to allow GMA to leave. De Lima is a lawyer, an 'officer of the Court', and she is bound under her lawyer's oath to give due respect to the Court and be an instrument for people to respect the Court -- even if the latter is (in her opinion) wrong.

    Law students nowadays are learning how erroneous the Supreme Court was in declaring that Erap had "constructively resigned" (a non-existent ground in our Constitution to remove a sitting President) in 2001 and legitimized GMA's reign. But you did not see me ranting and raving about the injustice. The most that i said in interviews was, "I have a contrary opinion about the issue, but i am an officer of the court so i am duty-bound to respect the Court's order."

    As the Erap illegal ouster has created a monster that is GMA, the De Lima defiance of the Supreme Court may create a bigger monster -- A POSSIBLE ANARCHY WHEN PEOPLE START THINKING THAT THEY CAN DEFY COURT ORDERS AND STILL GET AWAY WITH IT.
    i am also not a fan of you atty fortun but i have to agree with you just like with ping and chiz.

    you cannot broadcast to the media na mapapakulong mo si GMA kung under investigation pa or di pa airtight ang laban. btw,, one of the plunder cases was dismissed. medyo yun din ang pinakaweak. tingnan mo sila gma sila sila lang ang nakakaalam na me macoconvict si erap at mapapardon. mga di pa dapat sabihin e broadcast na. tapos pa natanso sasabihin bias ang SC. when ba naging fair ang SC. but we need an SC to be the final arbiter of the land. and besides they cannot enforce, they just interpret the law.

    kitang kita naman sa pananalita ng mga magagaling ng senador ping at chiz. me kalaban sila sa popularidad next election. si media conscious de lima. de lima is riding the bandwagon na gustong sumikat at the expense of a corrupt official. ilan ba ang na-elect last election na ang tanging ginawa e maging anti-GMA at wala namang sinabing gagawin para umakyat ang bansa natin.

    btw, di naman tayo constitutionalists so wag na tayo mag marunong kung constitution ang pag uusapan. heheheh

  15. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    40,599
    #15
    ang tingin ko they are not yet filing the case dahil they are trying to make it airtight. you're not gonna file a case just for the sake of filing. mababasura rin lang kaagad ng korte kung hinde airtight...saka meorn ako nabasa ewan ko sino nagsabi before xmas naka file na yan

  16. Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    6,940
    #16
    Ayaw nila hilaw, baka ma Vizconde, kaso tong mga Arroyo mautak din iniikuatan ang proseso at nagpapaawa.. Tapos may mga tanga naman na kumakagat

  17. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    17,338
    #17
    Quote Originally Posted by shadow View Post
    ang tingin ko they are not yet filing the case dahil they are trying to make it airtight. you're not gonna file a case just for the sake of filing. mababasura rin lang kaagad ng korte kung hinde airtight...saka meorn ako nabasa ewan ko sino nagsabi before xmas naka file na yan
    I have the same sentiments... baka ma-Oliver Lozano sila. File ng file, butas butas naman.

  18. Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    447
    #18
    dapat saatin "guilty, until proven innocent" hekhekhek

  19. Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    2,566
    #19
    hahaha.. pabilisan na lang
    kung ganyan sana noon pa di walang ganitong nangyari


    http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/nation/11...tage-case-horn


    ito d best

    Horn alleged some lawmakers were threatened that their pork barrel will be cut if they will not sign the resolution.

  20. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    40,599
    #20
    Quote Originally Posted by jansky
    hahaha.. pabilisan na lang
    kung ganyan sana noon pa di walang ganitong nangyari

    http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/nation/11...tage-case-horn

    ito d best

    Horn alleged some lawmakers were threatened that their pork barrel will be cut if they will not sign the resolution.
    ^ironic lahat yan ginawa din nila and they are now saying Mali ganyan? Nagkaroon na ng blue print and penoy admin sa mga dapat gawin harassment Ginagaya lang nila yun ginagawa ng admin ni GMA...

    As for the pork barrel ganun din ginawa nila nun nagkaroon ng impeachment...hehehe what goes around, comes around

Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
De Lima order to hold Arroyo is it unconstitutional ?