New Roll Over Ratings for SUV released

**pakupakupaku** · September 4th, 2007 01:50 PM

Sir old blue how did you know thats its a 2-5 ratio between santafe and outie? or your just Bashing the outie coz u have a sante fe? Dont get me wrong, i used the spec of santafe to COMPARE it with the outie just to predict if it gone to the test and if it would pass it.

**Horsepower** · September 4th, 2007 06:54 PM

Originally Posted by pakupakupaku

The outlander neither Passed or Failed but it has an Evo-inspired aluminum roof panel saves 11 pounds and significantly lowers the center of gravity and 1.7 inch lower than santa fe's height. 600-foot slalom = 62.7 mph (avg) compared to santa fe's 60.3 mph (avg), 300lb+ lighter. Sante fe has a wider wheelbase by 1.2 inches. If the taller and narrower vehicle tends to rollover more, outlander "should" pass it. Im no expert but looking at these figures raises the question why wouldnt it pass. Experts please clarify if i miss anything.

http://www.euroncap.com the outlander scored better in crash testing than the santa fe thats a plus.

You mean to say the Pedestrian protection??? If you read it carefully, it says that Hyundai didn't nominate test zones for the SF. That's the reason why there wasn't a score.

**pakupakupaku** · September 5th, 2007 02:24 AM

Originally Posted by Horsepower

You mean to say the Pedestrian protection??? If you read it carefully, it says that Hyundai didn't nominate test zones for the SF. That's the reason why there wasn't a score.

Sorry for the OT... I didnt looked at the pedestrian protection.

The Outlander
Front impact
Structures in the dashboard presented a potential risk of injury to the knees and femurs of the front seat occupants.
Side impact
The Outlander scored maximum points in the side impact and pole tests

The Santa Fe
Front impact
Several of the structures in the dashboard presented a risk of injury to the pelvis, femurs and knees of the driver and passenger.
Side impact
The Santa Fe scored maximum points for its performance in the side impact test. However, in the pole test, the head-protecting airbag did not fully deploy as intended by Hyundai and the car lost one of the two points available for that test.

In child protection the outie scored a 35, 1 point lower than the santafe.
Well this test does not apply to a real accident which has lots of environmental factors to consider. Im satisfied that they both provide adequate protection to the owner and passengers.

Im comparing the specs of the outie and santafe because they almost have the same specs with observance to rollover probability (height-weight-width-slalom-center of gravity etc....) since they are no reports for the outlander yet(maybe). In a perfect test environment, if two cars have the same overall spec but different brands wouldnt you say that the results will be match or has minimal difference?

I dont favor outie over santafe or vice versa, im asking the experts based on previous post if the outie would likely pass the test or not.

The outlander neither Passed or Failed but it has an Evo-inspired aluminum roof panel saves 11 pounds and significantly lowers the center of gravity and 1.7 inch lower than santa fe's height. 600-foot slalom = 62.7 mph (avg) compared to santa fe's 60.3 mph (avg), 300lb+ lighter. Sante fe has a wider wheelbase by 1.2 inches. If the taller and narrower vehicle tends to rollover more, outlander "should" pass it. Im no expert but looking at these figures raises the question why wouldnt it pass. Experts please clarify if i miss anything.

i guess i have to go with BB's answer

outlander bagong bago pa kaya ala pa rating! :rofl01:

**TFR** · September 5th, 2007 09:20 AM

Pareho lang silang magaling!!!

**Camgen6** · September 5th, 2007 10:26 AM

Nagiging Outlander vs. Santa Fe thread na naman to.

**oldblue** · September 5th, 2007 03:31 PM

sa pagkaalam ko tatlong taon na outlander sa America or bale 1 yr older sa Sta Fe pero di pa din included sa ratings

**BlueBimmer** · September 5th, 2007 03:50 PM

^tsk tsk get your facts straight naman before mindlessly posting away

http://www.automotive.com/2006/12/mi...ews/index.html

http://www.internetautoguide.com/rev...006/index.html

**pakupakupaku** · September 6th, 2007 02:34 AM

Para akong nkipagtalo sa erpat ko (kitid wetware

), tagalog na lang. Hinde ko sinasabing mas maganda ang santafe nyo kaysa outlander at hinde ko rin sinasabi mas maganda ang outlander sa santa fe.

Pinag kukumpara ko sila kase halos pareho sila ng haba,laki,lapad at bigat etc. Kaya ko ginamit yung pinakamahal ninyong santafe sa pag kumpara kase wala pang resulta yung outlander sa roll over test, kaya ang ginawa ko ay naghanap ako ng maiihambing sa outlander, eh nagkataon na ang pinakamalapit ay ang santa fe kaya ko siya ginamit. Ibig sabihin ng walang resulta ay hinde pa sila nakapag test ng sasakyan.

Hinde rin naman ibig sabihin na bumagsak na ito manong. Pag ang dalawang bagay ay halos magkapareho may chance na kung anong gawin mo dun sa isa HALOS pareho sila ng resulta. Nauubusan na ako ng tagalog kaya
paki hanap na lang po yung ibig sabihin ng [SIZE=7]Comparative Analysis

[/SIZE]

**surg** · September 6th, 2007 10:16 AM

The 2007 outlander we have now is totally different from the 2006 or older models. the 2007 outlander is as it is, newly released lang talaga.I think old blue should research first before posting at hindi yun banat ng banat nonsense naman. in almost every topic, biased or one-sided ang mga opinions nya or as pakupakupaku post: "kitid wetware"

**BlueBimmer** · September 6th, 2007 10:18 AM

Originally Posted by surg

The 2007 outlander we have now is totally different from the 2006 or older models. the 2007 outlander is as it is, newly released lang talaga.I think old blue should research first before posting at hindi yun banat ng banat nonsense naman. in almost every topic, biased or one-sided ang mga opinions nya or as pakupakupaku post: "kitid wetware"

pansin mo rin boss ha, spin doctor daw e.

manong :rofl01: