your legal problems here

[jack_husain]

you don't need a lawyer. go to your psychiatrist and order a straitjacket [emoji122] [emoji1]

You mean like this?


Damn, I need to Google it to get the punch! Bwahahahaha!

[kagalingan]

Corporal mart or any other lawyer

Possible ba pag gumawa ako village eh bawal diesel engine sa loob village eh hindi makademanda mga unit owner.

and pag next level na possible ba a mayor to ban diesel in selected places not the whole city.

[Al_vinQ]

Hi po. I need Help

First time ko po bumili ng sasakyan. Bumili po ako ng Brand new car last Oct 20, 2016 sa Hyundai. Bale nahihirapan po ako magpaapprove sa bangko kaya lumalabas po na inilipat sa akin yung approval ng iba kaya hindi sa akin nakapangalan yung kotse. (assumption of mortgage) pero dumaan naman po kami sa legal na proseso. Before po kami magpunta sa Showroom ay matagal na po ako nakikipag usap sa agent/broker, nakipagkita muna rin ako sa kanya pati na rin sa original na may ari ng sasakyan mga 1 week before.

Yung araw rin po na iyon *naiuwi namin yung kotse. Nagbayad po ako ng Downpayment na 140k at nagpunta ng Atty para sa mga legal na documents. Naibigay rin po nila sa akin ang OR ng sasakyan. Naging maayos naman lahat hanggang last thursday Nov 10, 2016 nakareceived ako ng call mula sa agent at sinabi na nagkamali raw ang accountant ng Hyundai sa Monthly amortization, so imbis na 13,300 ay 14,300 raw po. Sobrang nabigla ako dahil mula day 1 na pakikipagusap ko sa agent ay malinaw naman lahat. At sa mismong OR ay 13,300 talaga ang nakalagay.

Sana matulungan niyo po ako kung anong pwede kong gawin? Kasi sa tuwing makakausap ko ang Hyundai ay inaamin naman nila yung pagkakamali pero wala silang binibigay na solusyon na parang sinasabi nila na I have to deal with it. Nasa akin ang mga conversation namin nung agent/broker na katunayan na 140k DP at 13,300 MA at iyun rin naman ang nakalagay sa OR na binigay nila sakin. TIA po

[Juan Martinez]

Hi po. I need Help

First time ko po bumili ng sasakyan. Bumili po ako ng Brand new car last Oct 20, 2016 sa Hyundai. Bale nahihirapan po ako magpaapprove sa bangko kaya lumalabas po na inilipat sa akin yung approval ng iba kaya hindi sa akin nakapangalan yung kotse. (assumption of mortgage) pero dumaan naman po kami sa legal na proseso. Before po kami magpunta sa Showroom ay matagal na po ako nakikipag usap sa agent/broker, nakipagkita muna rin ako sa kanya pati na rin sa original na may ari ng sasakyan mga 1 week before.

Yung araw rin po na iyon *naiuwi namin yung kotse. Nagbayad po ako ng Downpayment na 140k at nagpunta ng Atty para sa mga legal na documents. Naibigay rin po nila sa akin ang OR ng sasakyan. Naging maayos naman lahat hanggang last thursday Nov 10, 2016 nakareceived ako ng call mula sa agent at sinabi na nagkamali raw ang accountant ng Hyundai sa Monthly amortization, so imbis na 13,300 ay 14,300 raw po. Sobrang nabigla ako dahil mula day 1 na pakikipagusap ko sa agent ay malinaw naman lahat. At sa mismong OR ay 13,300 talaga ang nakalagay.

Sana matulungan niyo po ako kung anong pwede kong gawin? Kasi sa tuwing makakausap ko ang Hyundai ay inaamin naman nila yung pagkakamali pero wala silang binibigay na solusyon na parang sinasabi nila na I have to deal with it. Nasa akin ang mga conversation namin nung agent/broker na katunayan na 140k DP at 13,300 MA at iyun rin naman ang nakalagay sa OR na binigay nila sakin. TIA po

It is possible that Hyundai's employee made a mistake in computing your monthly amortization. However, to erase any doubt, you need to verify with the mortgagee (the bank where the car is mortgaged) if it is true that your MA is Php14,300 (and not Php13,300) because, ultimately, it is where your monthly amortization is going, not Hyundai.

No person shall unjustly enrich himself at the expense of another. Now, if your MA is really Php14,300 (as computed by the bank), then you are bound to pay that amount.

Unless the bank has made Hyundai its agent in this transaction, whatever fault committed by the latter will not affect the right of the former to collect from you the correct amount.

Now, I need to ask you this question: Did Hyundai's representation that you need only to pay Php13,300 as MA the main reason you bought the Elantra?

[macsd]

Hi po. I need Help

First time ko po bumili ng sasakyan. Bumili po ako ng Brand new car last Oct 20, 2016 sa Hyundai. Bale nahihirapan po ako magpaapprove sa bangko kaya lumalabas po na inilipat sa akin yung approval ng iba kaya hindi sa akin nakapangalan yung kotse. (assumption of mortgage) pero dumaan naman po kami sa legal na proseso. Before po kami magpunta sa Showroom ay matagal na po ako nakikipag usap sa agent/broker, nakipagkita muna rin ako sa kanya pati na rin sa original na may ari ng sasakyan mga 1 week before.

Yung araw rin po na iyon *naiuwi namin yung kotse. Nagbayad po ako ng Downpayment na 140k at nagpunta ng Atty para sa mga legal na documents. Naibigay rin po nila sa akin ang OR ng sasakyan. Naging maayos naman lahat hanggang last thursday Nov 10, 2016 nakareceived ako ng call mula sa agent at sinabi na nagkamali raw ang accountant ng Hyundai sa Monthly amortization, so imbis na 13,300 ay 14,300 raw po. Sobrang nabigla ako dahil mula day 1 na pakikipagusap ko sa agent ay malinaw naman lahat. At sa mismong OR ay 13,300 talaga ang nakalagay.

Sana matulungan niyo po ako kung anong pwede kong gawin? Kasi sa tuwing makakausap ko ang Hyundai ay inaamin naman nila yung pagkakamali pero wala silang binibigay na solusyon na parang sinasabi nila na I have to deal with it. Nasa akin ang mga conversation namin nung agent/broker na katunayan na 140k DP at 13,300 MA at iyun rin naman ang nakalagay sa OR na binigay nila sakin. TIA po

I will be more worried about the car not being under your name rather than the amortization cost. Yung amortization can be validated by simple math. Eh yung kotse na nakapangalana sa iba , that "iba" can make a legal claim and/or how are you gonna sell the car not under your name?

[Elroi]

need an advice..

meron property yung inlaws ko na gusto na ibenta (residential lot only) nakapangalan sa Father at Mother inlaw ko.. FIL died nung 2008 while MIL and all my wife's 3 siblings are based na sa US.. Now gusto nila na yung wife ko ang magbenta ng property since sya na lang ang nandito sa pinas.

will a SPA from my MIL & siblings suffice.. how do we do this?

[_Cathy_]

Bayad na na estate tax ng FIL mo?

Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk

[dr. d]

need an advice..

meron property yung inlaws ko na gusto na ibenta (residential lot only) nakapangalan sa Father at Mother inlaw ko.. FIL died nung 2008 while MIL and all my wife's 3 siblings are based na sa US.. Now gusto nila na yung wife ko ang magbenta ng property since sya na lang ang nandito sa pinas.

will a SPA from my MIL & siblings suffice.. how do we do this?

MIL and their anaks living there, can go to the philippine embassy or consulate, and make their documents there.

[macsd]

Why is it that among all professional licensure exams, it's the bar exam that is always having the fiesta atmosphere (sometime granade throwing pa) & has the most visible supporters?

[Juan Martinez]

Why is it that among all professional licensure exams, it's the bar exam that is always having the fiesta atmosphere (sometime granade throwing pa) & has the most visible supporters?

because, senior, it is a test on who you are and what are you made of rather than what you know...

[dr. d]

because, senior, it is a test on who you are and what are you made of rather than what you know...

errr... how does a written exam determine that?

[Juan Martinez]

need an advice..

meron property yung inlaws ko na gusto na ibenta (residential lot only) nakapangalan sa Father at Mother inlaw ko.. FIL died nung 2008 while MIL and all my wife's 3 siblings are based na sa US.. Now gusto nila na yung wife ko ang magbenta ng property since sya na lang ang nandito sa pinas.

will a SPA from my MIL & siblings suffice.. how do we do this?

no, SPA is not enough. what the heirs should do is to execute an EXTRAJUDICIAL SETTLEMENT OF ESTATE WITH SIMULTANEOUS SALE.

those heirs (the surviving spouse and the siblings of your wife) who are residing in the states shall acknowledge the said document at the philippine consulate where they are. your wife, who is here, shall also sign the same considering that she's also an heir and must acknowledge it before a notary public in the philippines.

SPA isn't enough because they need to settle the estate of your father-in-law.

[Juan Martinez]

errr... how does a written exam determine that?

we have different perception. just try it, and let's see if you can make it. if you do and you just breeze through it, then i'm wrong.

it's not an examination where most of the time 75 percent will make it. in 1999, there were only 16 percent who made it. the most, 30 something percent.

might be the reason why some lawyers have airs because they made it-- that is, they read the whole facking library in four years and passed it!

just like that guy who first scaled mt everest who said: "it's not the mountain that we conquer-- but ourselves."

[macsd]

because, senior, it is a test on who you are and what are you made of rather than what you know...

Senior, if your referring to the likes of Ka Pepe Diokno, FM and your self, i would agree. But there are lawyers of the like as Oliver Lozano & Elly Pamatong that may not apply that principle. I believe all licensure exams are difficult as shown in the failing rates but it's only the bar is held on a different atmosphere
or is it because it's not the SC that supervise & oversee the exams rather than the PRC ?

[Juan Martinez]

I believe all licensure exams are difficult as shown in the failing rates but it's only the bar is held on a different atmosphere
or is it because it's the SC that supervise & oversee the exams rather than the PRC ?

most probably. but i have another theory: most people put lawyers on the pedestal.

[Elroi]

Bayad na na estate tax ng FIL mo?

Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk

MIL and their anaks living there, can go to the philippine embassy or consulate, and make their documents there.

no, SPA is not enough. what the heirs should do is to execute an EXTRAJUDICIAL SETTLEMENT OF ESTATE WITH SIMULTANEOUS SALE.

those heirs (the surviving spouse and the siblings of your wife) who are residing in the states shall acknowledge the said document at the philippine consulate where they are. your wife, who is here, shall also sign the same considering that she's also an heir and must acknowledge it before a notary public in the philippines.

SPA isn't enough because they need to settle the estate of your father-in-law.

regarding estate tax, AFAIK hindi pa settled ito.

to make things complicated, separated na si FIL & MIL since early 90s pa though not legally. FIL has a 2nd family na, they're residing in another province at doon sya namatay sa poder ni #2. Meron sya 3 kids doon na puro legal age na.

knowing this, meron ba mababago dun sa advise ni Sir JM?


******************
one more thing, umuwi si MIL & all my wife's siblings last 2011 for a family reunion. while here sa Pinas, nag-execute sila ng SPA to my wife to sell yung isang property na nakapangalan din sa FIL & MIL ko. Kumare ng MIL ko yung bumili kaya walang problema kahit alam nya patay na si FIL. Valid ba yung transaction at yung deed of sale na pinirmahan ng wife ko at buyer?

[Juan Martinez]

to make things complicated, separated na si FIL & MIL since early 90s pa though not legally. FIL has a 2nd family na, they're residing in another province at doon sya namatay sa poder ni #2. Meron sya 3 kids doon na puro legal age na.

knowing this, meron ba mababago dun sa advise ni Sir JM?

the de facto separation between the spouses does not have legal effect on their property relation.

one more thing, umuwi si MIL & all my wife's siblings last 2011 for a family reunion. while here sa Pinas, nag-execute sila ng SPA to my wife to sell yung isang property na nakapangalan din sa FIL & MIL ko. Kumare ng MIL ko yung bumili kaya walang problema kahit alam nya patay na si FIL. Valid ba yung transaction at yung deed of sale na pinirmahan ng wife ko at buyer?

the deed of sale is unenforceable.

a contract entered into in the name of another person by one who has been given no authority or legal representation is unenforceable (art.1403, civil code).

if your in laws got married after 1988, the family code shall apply.

under the family code, in the event that one spouse is incapacitated or otherwise unable to participate in the administration of the COMMON PROPERTIES, the other spouse may assume sole powers of administration. These powers do not include disposition or encumbrance without authority of the court or the written consent of the other spouse. in the absence of such authority or consent, the disposition or encumbrance shall be void.

[_Cathy_]

Can a grandparent really remove the inheritance of a grandson or granddaughter? What if some of the children died already and the property has been transferred to the children? Isn't it that is automatically the inheritance of the grandchildren? Does the grandparent still have control over that? Can they sell without the signature of the grandchildren?

[Juan Martinez]

Can a grandparent really remove the inheritance of a grandson or granddaughter?

a decedent can disinherit a compulsory heir only on specific grounds provided for under the civil code. so, if the reason of the disinheritance is not of those enumerated under civil code, then it has no legal effect. please take note though that grandchildren are not really direct descendants or compulsory legal heirs of their grandparents. in other words, they cannot inherit from their grandparents as long as their parents are still alive. they can inherit only by right of representation, that is, when their parents predeceased (die ahead of) their own parents.

What if some of the children died already and the property has been transferred to the children? Isn't it that is automatically the inheritance of the grandchildren?

if the property was already transferred to the children during the lifetime of their parents by way of donation or sale, then their own children will inherit the property in their own right and not by right of representation.

Does the grandparent still have control over that?

nope. the general rule is that, succession flows like a river. ascendants (like grandparents) are excluded from the inheritance with presence of the descendants.

Can they sell without the signature of the grandchildren?

nope. nemo dat quod non habet- you cannot dispose of which you do not have.

[khrisme]

What to do if someone is building a house on your property inside a subdivision. They are building it for two weeks na, I notice the construction after I've been to the car wash near the property. Thanks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk