
Originally Posted by
Alpha_One
Essentially you're asking me (us) to disprove God, not prove evolution. You're using "God isn't a science, Evolution is, I can't prove God, prove evolution" as a magic shield to all of a sudden make your "arguments" immune to any form of attack.
There's plenty of evidence to suggest such a phenomenon, but at the same time there's a lot of pieces missing in the puzzle. To continue the puzzle analogy, you're building a jigsaw puzzle and from the incomplete puzzle you vaguely see the image of what appears dog. But the missing pieces suggest it "might" not be a dog. The existing pieces however, suggest that more likely than not, it is a dog. This is what the Theory of Evolution is, at the moment. You, being so "knowledgeable" about evolution having been a "defender" of it, should know better (hey, you said so yourself, you should know better!).