New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Results 1 to 14 of 14

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    57,760
    #1
    Waiting for EQ and Mr Big's take on this

    EDIT: in our contract 1 and 2 are considered wear and tear pala. But when tenant requests, we have them repair/replace and deduct the cost na lang sa rental fee. Goodwill na namin. We want our tenants to stay as long as possible

    Pero pag end of contact, just like what cns said, everything should be in good working condition, then we use the deposit if needed
    Last edited by _Cathy_; January 24th, 2019 at 04:33 PM.

  2. Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    3,522
    #2
    Wear and tear at lessor
    Consumables at lessee

    Wear and tear like shower head, toilet tank flush, faucet/U-trap sa lavatory at kitchen sink, valves, door knob(except due to negligence/nalimutan susi at winarak), paint, tiles,ceiling, cupboard, cabinet hinges, aircon bracket, intercom, light switch & AC outlet. Sama na kung kasama sa lease ang hood range, cook top, water heater, ACU, ref like sa airBNB.

    Consumables & improvements/accessories like faucet valve gasket, light bulbs, blinds, furniture ng tenant

  3. Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    57,760
    #3
    Quote Originally Posted by 12vdc View Post
    Wear and tear at lessor
    Consumables at lessee

    Wear and tear like shower head, toilet tank flush, faucet/U-trap sa lavatory at kitchen sink, valves, door knob(except due to negligence/nalimutan susi at winarak), paint, tiles,ceiling, cupboard, cabinet hinges, aircon bracket, intercom, light switch & AC outlet. Sama na kung kasama sa lease ang hood range, cook top, water heater, ACU, ref like sa airBNB.

    Consumables & improvements/accessories like faucet valve gasket, light bulbs, blinds, furniture ng tenant
    Wow that is a solid lease contract.

  4. Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    6,813
    #4
    Opinion ko lang, 1&2 sa tenant, 3&4 sa owner.

    Hindi ko alam ano correct term dun sa first two but these things are subject to the tenant "traffic" or things na subject to mis-use, therefore resulting in unnecessary damage. Syempre may qualification din, like kung kakalipat pa lang at tumulo gripo, then baka faulty yung item na nabili.

    Sa 3, sa owner because walang kinalaman ang tenant dun unless they have kids who shoot water guns at the ceiling, it can be either due to poor workmanship or tulo from the unit above, not the fault of the tenant.

    Likewise with 4, if it cracked due to something heavy dropped by tenant, syempre charge sa kanya.

    Again opinion ko lang ito and what for me is fair to both parties.

Tags for this Thread

Tenant and Owner Obligation