Given the frequency of professional board exam leakages in the country, I would say there is always a cloud of doubt if a professional passed honestly unless there is compelling evidence to prove otherwise (honors grad from reputable school, solid character, etc.).
The only difference with the 2006 nursing board exam, as is the case for all others that were publicized, is that there was a whistleblower.
Thus, in determining the competency of a particular professional, I would be more inclined to make the judgment based on that person's character and background. It will, of course, help tremendously if s/he graduated from a reputable school.
As for seeking medical treatment, the hospital obviously matters. After all, hospitals do have their own qualifying processes for hiring nurses as well and a reputable hospital will more likely have competent nurses.
So for me, I would not necessarily prejudge a 2006 nursing graduate re his or her competency to take care of me just because s/he was unfortunate to have belonged to this batch.



Reply With Quote

