[merged] ingat sa gitgitan at makipagduruan sa kalye.

[take1bar]

Exactly. I don't think the shooter was able to control himself. There was no legitimate threat to his life and yet he acted by killing two people.

I think both got out of control but the gun owner was not responsible enough to own his firearm. Buti sana kung bumaba siya't tinutukan lang for Canizares to get back into his car and drive off. But he actually shot him, and his female companion. Warning or not I don't think that was the right thing to do.

Based on the news gathered it is very premature to draw his gun and pull the trigger, no unlawful aggression and reasonable necessity to repel and prevent the bad mouthing of Canizares. There is no showing that Canizares is holding any deadly weapon. Maybe even tutukan lang will do no good "mahabla ka pa grave threat". I suggest keep your arms and use it responsibly, draw and fire it "only" in extreme conditions.

[mbeige]

Based on the news gathered it is very premature to draw his gun and pull the trigger, no unlawful aggression and reasonable necessity to repel and prevent the bad mouthing of Canizares. There is no showing that Canizares is holding any deadly weapon. Maybe even tutukan lang will do no good "mahabla ka pa grave threat". I suggest keep your arms and use it responsibly, draw and fire it "only" in extreme conditions.

You're right, exposing the firearm is already a threat in itself. Maybe a verbal warning would have been better on the shooter's behalf to ward off Canizares and prevent any more confrontation.

I think here in the US there's a law that states that the ammunition of your firearm should be separate and difficult to access from the weapon. So the ammo stays in either trunk or cabin, with the gun concealed in the other compartment. It should be the same there. But then again enforcement is another matter.

Both sides ruined their lives.