Tigas sa China...
Mobile Execution (Van)
kung death panalty lang pupunta sa doorstep ko, wag na! ako na lang pupunta at kahit sobrang trapik ok lang :hysterical:
Dito mas bagay yung ibaril na lang sa ulo, para mas matipid, isang bala lang![]()
Dapat sa VAN na ito nila idiretso iyong mga holdaper ng RCBC Cabuyao, Laguna!![]()
holy shiz i don't wanna see this death bus not even parked on our driveway! :nerves:
execute the prisoner with a gunshot to the back of the head then charge the bullet to the family. . .and now this. . .they don't run out of cruel ideas. . .
Kung dito iyan gagawin sa Pilipinas, dadaigin pa natin ang China and the rest of the world, sa dami ng magiging "customers" ng death van na iyan... Ubos ang mga kaw*t*n sa lipunan.....
6303:fetch:
I don't get this line said by the maker of the death van, "The switch from gunshots to injections is a sign that China promotes human rights now," says Kang Zhongwen...
How can death penalty promote human rights?
ok ah, de sundo pa..kumbaga tama yung sabi na, sinusundo ka na ni kamatayan..
Let's not turn this into another one of those debates. That wasn't what I was asking about.
My point was that whether it used gunshots or lethal injections, the end result was the same within the context of the recipient of the death penalty.
Too bad we can't use mobile execution van for reckless and irresponsible public utility drivers. Tignan ko lang kung hindi biglang sumunod sa batas trapiko ang mga 'yan!![]()
Maybe the statement was taken out of context, or as is usually the case, literally misinterpreted.
Methinks what the Chinese was actually saying is that injections are a more HUMANE form of killing convicts, and that China is promoting HUMANE, rather than brutal executions, which they see as a promotion of human rights.
But of course, that's a tongue-in-cheek statement![]()
sweet. they should have one of these in the US.
i volunteer to be the person whose job it is to tell it who to visit:diablo:
I see, thanks for the clarification.It didn't make sense the first time I read it. I think it does now ...