Results 11 to 20 of 25
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Posts
- 54,286
April 10th, 2016 10:07 AM #11
i found the last statement, "disconcerting".
so how did the patient find out about the radiologist's agenda?
but this story is already "second hand". kuwento ng na-i-kuwentohan... the passage of factual information might not have been "faithful"...
but yes.. the story does not speak well... of the radiologist as well as of the patient.
my 95 centavos' worth.Last edited by dr. d; April 10th, 2016 at 10:16 AM.
-
BANNED BANNED BANNED
- Join Date
- Sep 2015
- Posts
- 13,917
April 10th, 2016 04:22 PM #12-
Not really secondy hand kwento. Hindi ko sya close friend pero sya mismo kausap ko.. Kaya i put it "Meron ako alam isang kaso"
Tinawagan sya gabi sa cellphone nagpakilala yung radiologist. Telling na cancerous at meron na irerefer na surgeon makakadiscount.
Mukhang negosyo na ito nung radiologist. Kunyari makakatulong. Atin atin lang ito.
The last statement you mean sa traditional raditional medicine? Yes doon sya gumaling. Yung attending hospital doctor nya prescribe medicine kaso hindi lumiliit yung problem sa neck nya. So for operation talaga.
Eh ayaw nya maga-opera so someone from his group tell her about a low profile doctor in ongpin st na famous in treating and curing disease.
Even doctors from st lukes, medical city and PGH who practice both western and TCM knew that doctor in ongpin st.
-
April 10th, 2016 04:34 PM #13
-
-
April 13th, 2016 06:46 AM #15
-
April 13th, 2016 08:00 AM #16
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Jul 2013
- Posts
- 2,450
April 13th, 2016 10:27 AM #17First I'm not a surgeon nor a doctor hehehe.
AFAIK, there is always a risk of infection after a surgery. I think it is a matter of preventing it by the surgeon and everything around him to be clean during the surgery and by taking medicines afterwards.
Now the question is where did the first doctor went wrong?
Did the second doctor explicitly said that there was a mistake during the first surgery? This is important because you do not want to provide a hearsay as an evidence.
Anyway, on a related note. My wife's 90 year old grandmother also recently had an operation because of a broken hip suffered from a fall. She was likewise discharged after a couple of days. She did not spend a lot of time in the hospital. Therapy was done in the house. SO far, there no reports of infection.
-
April 13th, 2016 01:31 PM #18
This is the same thing I was thinking reading the OP.
A doctor will NOT recommend that a patient stay in the hospital for prolonged periods after an operation simply to continue therapy there. This is unnecessary additional expense on the part of the patient.
As soon as a patient is stable and does not need to be observed for bleeding or cardiac problems, they can go home and have therapy done there.
Ang pagbalik ng comeback...
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Posts
- 306
April 13th, 2016 01:53 PM #19I dont know if you can win in court. The patient is 89 years old already and very at risk to infection no matter how good, clean and aseptic the operation was. Also, fractures are known not to heal as fast or even completely among geriatric patients. Maybe your first doctor failed to inform you about this but malpractice? I doubt it.
-
BANNED BANNED BANNED
- Join Date
- Jan 2015
- Posts
- 4,580
April 13th, 2016 02:27 PM #20
Yes, because 100 degree boiling point is measured at sea level. What's interesting also is that...
Overheating and mitigation methods