CHATBOX (kuno kasi walang chatbox sa tsikot)

[Archerfish]

why?

___________________

I've been thinking that if I were to be a moderator, not that I want to, there's a great possibility that I might make a mistake. In that case, who will check me?

I'm thinking if this applies to video uploaders. Who will check their comments? I have the impression that no one is regulating it. First time for me to spend time in YouTube, some comments are really awful and some comes from the uploader.

And I allowed my sons to be exposed in the online world without me checking on them. Although they are old enough, but there should be check and balance.

[uls]

may check and balance mga moderators ng tsikot if your question is who moderates the moderators

[brushless]

Is it possible for a moderator to be banned? I'm just curious...

Yes. If they are also violating the rules. You can report it to the site owners or to the admin for proper action.

For example, on this site, there is a "contact us" on the main page.

[Archerfish]

may check and balance mga moderators ng tsikot if your question is who moderates the moderators

In that case, how about YouTube? I saw one comment that his video has been deleted. However, there are some videos that does not violate copyrighted materials but are advocating unruly behaviors and unethical driving practice. Well, this is a rhetorical question.

By the way, I saw just this morning about this topic about you and *popcorn. That guy is funny. If my understanding is right, he is *minicarph. Where is he right now? I'm thinking that perhaps he is the same person as *kagalingan, both of them have funny comments or at least very entertaining for me.

I'm like a kid, I'm easily entertained.

[KingoftheNorth]

I've been thinking that if I were to be a moderator, not that I want to, there's a great possibility that I might make a mistake. In that case, who will check me?

I'm thinking if this applies to video uploaders. Who will check their comments? I have the impression that no one is regulating it. First time for me to spend time in YouTube, some comments are really awful and some comes from the uploader.

And I allowed my sons to be exposed in the online world without me checking on them. Although they are old enough, but there should be check and balance.

Comments on the internet which border on hate speech as opposed to those being ***ual, violent or "just awful" been the problem since internet and social media became all the rage.

Trouble is, you can't be online all the time to check on your children's activities or the kind of comments they give or are exposed to. The best defense is really a good guidance and values system you have given them.

[uls]

In that case, how about YouTube? I saw one comment that his video has been deleted. However, there are some videos that does not violate copyrighted materials but are advocating unruly behaviors and unethical driving practice. Well, this is a rhetorical question.

By the way, I saw just this morning about this topic about you and *popcorn. That guy is funny. If my understanding is right, he is *minicarph. Where is he right now? I'm thinking that perhaps he is the same person as *kagalingan, both of them have funny comments or at least very entertaining for me.

I'm like a kid, I'm easily entertained.

can't answer re youtube


-


re popcorn, yes he is minicarph

re kagalingan, no he's not minicarph

they may sound alike but they're different people

Kagalingan sounds like he's from QC (he knows all the banawe restos)

minicarph doesn't seem to go to QC based on his posts

[brushless]

angry lady poops at tim hortons store floor and throws her excrement at employees

Woman Took A Rage Dump On The Floor Of A Coffee Shop And Threw It At The Cashier

This is funny but disturbing. The lady must be mentally ill.

[Archerfish]

Yes. If they are also violating the rules. You can report it to the site owners or to the admin for proper action.

For example, on this site, there is a "contact us" on the main page.

Thank you. I don't think our moderators will violate the rules here. I'm thinking that YouTube uploaders are the designated moderators in their own right. I believe this is a mistake as pointed out by *KingoftheNorth.

Comments on the internet which border on hate speech as opposed to those being ***ual, violent or "just awful" been the problem since internet and social media became all the rage.

Trouble is, you can't be online all the time to check on your children's activities or the kind of comments they give or are exposed to. The best defense is really a good guidance and values system you have given them.

You are correct, no point in worrying about something that is beyond my control. I just didn't realize what the internet is offering to all that has access to it. Sometime ago, back when​ speed was 56 kbps, someone told me that chatrooms are one of the ways to "get what you want". I never got interested so I don't know what's in there.

So there are news that parents are "pushing their kids to chatting". I may be no different to these parents if I were just to let my two grown-up kids to this kind of world. The best that I can do is remind them tonight as we take our dinner.

Thank you for your clarification.

[Juan Martinez]

Thank you. I don't think our moderators will violate the rules here.

the (rhetorical) question posed by uls "who will moderate the moderators" is really a good question.

i did ask exactly the same question before.

i think a moderator must not only be impartial but must appear to be impartial.

also, a good moderator shall lead or moderate by example. once upon a time a member here called the attention of a moderator because he violated the rule on non-posting of advertisement. and because it is a dignified position, he or she shall not wash his or her dirty linen in public.

so in cases of flagrant violation of our rules by a moderator, it goes without saying that none but ourselves who shall moderate her or him as the existence of this forum depends on our continued presence here.

[brushless]

Thank you. I don't think our moderators will violate the rules here. I'm thinking that YouTube uploaders are the designated moderators in their own right. I believe this is a mistake as pointed out by *KingoftheNorth.

Although, we can say they are the designated moderators, you can report the video for abuse. This goes also for people who comment. You can report them as well. There is a drop down menu to do this freely.

I've been a viewer of Amos Yee's controversial youtube videos. Just recently, his channel was taken down by youtube.

[Archerfish]

the (rhetorical) question posed by uls "who will moderate the moderators" is really a good question.

i did ask exactly the same question before.

i think a moderator must not only be impartial but must appear to be impartial.

also, a good moderator shall lead or moderate by example. once upon a time a member here called the attention of a moderator because he violated the rule on non-posting of advertisement. and because it is a dignified position, he or she shall not wash his or her dirty linen in public.

so in cases of flagrant violation of our rules by a moderator, it goes without saying that none but ourselves who shall moderate her or him as the existence of this forum depends on our continued presence here.

The word impartial reminds me back when I was discussing a claim in insurance. The lawyer said that it will be better to accept the offer of the company than go for the full amount. Since the company has the right to appeal the case, the possibility of "the lot going to the wrong judge" will be a disadvantage​ for us.

And here comes the word impartial. I said​ I believe that all judges are impartial and should be impartial. However, he pointed out that some judges are biased to companies instead to laborers and vice versa. So we agreed for a settlement.

i think a moderator must not only be impartial but must appear to be impartial.

This part reminded of a friend who said that he's not doing anything wrong with the girl. So I answered,

"It's not enough that you're not doing anything wrong. But it should also look like you're not committing anything morally wrong."

Going back, it was wrong for me to compare the moderators of this forum to YouTube uploaders who I see the one responsible to moderate the comments.

I never knew about this moderator posting an advertisment, which is understandable because I'm new here. I'd like to think that he might have "forgotten" the rule.

And this one comes to my mind, about the DOT secretary that "she didn't know" about the contract of the Tulfo brothers. It may be possible, for the benefit of the doubt. However, the "appearance" of not knowing it is somewhat questionable.

Right now, the video of "Now It's My Turn" by Tulfo is 1.9 M and surely, the advertising companies are very happy. So I might try this Mega Sardines this week.

Reading back, it seems that I have convoluted thoughts changing from one topic to another. Is this even the right word, convoluted?

[Archerfish]

Although, we can say they are the designated moderators, you can report the video for abuse. This goes also for people who comment. You can report them as well. There is a drop down menu to do this freely.

I've been a viewer of Amos Yee's controversial youtube videos. Just recently, his channel was taken down by youtube.

I already reported​ the video. However, there's no option for you to explain why. I have the impression that you should reach a certain number of reports before it will be reviewed.

Now, what is this Amos Yee' videos? You have piqued my interest because of the word "controversial".

[brushless]

I already reported​ the video. However, there's no option for you to explain why. I have the impression that you should reach a certain number of reports before it will be reviewed.

Now, what is this Amos Yee' videos? You have piqued my interest because of the word "controversial".

Although his channel is no longer there, he is all over youtube from other channels who saved his videos. lol



The guy is entertaining. lol!!

He got booted off youtube because of defending pedophilia. HAhahaha! Trolling the youtube community since. LOL!

[kagalingan]

I think quezon avenue is the "con man" capital of the philippines. If you want to be train maging mang-gagancho eh this is the place.

Why???

ngayon ko lang napansin na quezon avene e networking/multi-level marketing capital of the philippines. Grabe tabi-tabi pala dito. Eh in a week ilan beses ako dumadaan pero now ko lang napansin. Usually kasi sa gabi to madaling-araw kaya hindi ko pansin.

Eh i posted before na car casa capital din ang qave. Alam nyo din na night club capital din yan.

So networker, ahente ng kotse, prostitute = all of these are trained to con.

Pag-iisipan ko pa kung sino pinakaworst among the three.

[brushless]

So, I was changing my electrical outlet and then I found this. LIZARD EGGS!!



I think I'm going to wait for it to hatch. Feed it with tiny ipis and then let it go.

[Archerfish]

Although his channel is no longer there, he is all over youtube from other channels who saved his videos. lol



The guy is entertaining. lol!!

He got booted off youtube because of defending pedophilia. HAhahaha! Trolling the youtube community since. LOL!

This guy might be entertaining, but I have decided to pass on this.

[ninjababez]

isa siyang manloloko, magnanakaw at nanlalamang ng kapwa. - YouTube

Ang bata pa nito ...

Sent from my SM-C900F using Tapatalk

[MR_BIG18]

isa siyang manloloko, magnanakaw at nanlalamang ng kapwa. - YouTube

Ang bata pa nito ...

Sent from my SM-C900F using Tapatalk

And after doing it...he will brag to his peers.

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk

[benchph1]

Cannot do anything stupid nowadays. Theres always a cctv somewhere watching


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[ninjababez]

sana makulong maski 48 hours man lang ano, tapos walang kain and tubig.