Results 11 to 20 of 20
-
September 21st, 2005 08:50 PM #11
might i suggest joining phphoto (yahoo groups) or pinoyphotography.org (forum) for help with regards to photography, learning new tips and tricks, etc.
also, as mbt mentioned, your pretty much stuck with whatever you choose. Not unless Canon does another boo boo like the former mount they were using (forgot what it's called).
also, it doesn't really matter what body you would use because you can easily upgrade. lenses on the other hand you tend to keep.
-
September 21st, 2005 09:00 PM #12Originally Posted by theveed
sir theveed, it's considered that the d70 to d70s is much in line with the 300d to 350d model upgrade. i would guess you'll make the same choice had you tested the new ones.
-
September 21st, 2005 09:08 PM #13Originally Posted by mbt
-
September 21st, 2005 09:16 PM #14Originally Posted by need4speed
good for me both brands have good service centers here. though it's different nga daw in pi as earlier mentioned, where canon has better suport there.
-
September 21st, 2005 09:16 PM #15
talo yung sensor ng D70 sa sensor ng 350D, particularly on image noise. additional 2 MP (which isn't worth much really), but more importantly, very low noise! D70 gets grainy at ISO 800, i tried one out at a columbia store with my old 60 mm micro nikkor hehe. i figured that if i'm buying a DSLR for high ISO performance, might as well get the best one there is. that said, the D70's noise is still lower and less objectionable than the small-sensor digicams.
it's been said that the 350D's sensor is practically identical in performance to the sensor of the 20D.
Wild Ace,
350D is a HUGE improvement from the original 300D. on the other hand, d70s is a TINY step up from the D70... mainly a little tweaking with the AF system and a 0.2" larger screen. in other words, practically nothing (but that's not really bad at all, since the D70 is very feature-packed in the first place).
-
September 21st, 2005 09:25 PM #16Originally Posted by mbt
is it a better choice/deal?
-
September 21st, 2005 09:42 PM #17
i'd say yes, easily.
constant f/2.8 vs. f/3.5-4.5 is a HUGE difference and means a brighter viefinder and extended low-light shots (although it still may not be fast enough for dim indoor candids). you'll be giving up 20 mm (effectively 30 mm) on the zoom end, but for me, it's well worth it. the sigma is also said to be very sharp, practically in line with the pro-grade Canon L lenses. you'll give up USM/AF-S too, but it shouldn't be too big a deal.
i'd also consider the 24-120 VR nikon lens as an 18-70 replacement (although you give up the wide-angle... so pair it with a Tokina 12-24 mm hehe)
-
September 21st, 2005 10:03 PM #18
waaaah! yung flash pa ngapala!
(guess this can wait for a while.)
pero ika nga, mabuti na yung may foresight... sa darating pang gastos! hehe.
-
September 21st, 2005 10:10 PM #19
lufet sir mbt, nakakalunod ang input mo ah! hinde yung info... yung nakaambang gastos! :oops:
(sabi na nga ba ng nanay ko cross-stitch na lang gawin kong hobby eh.)
-
Somewhat expected from a rushed car from a first time carmaker
Xiaomi E-Car