New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 191 of 273 FirstFirst ... 91141181187188189190191192193194195201241 ... LastLast
Results 1,901 to 1,910 of 2721
  1. Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    241
    #1901
    Quote Originally Posted by keithchan View Post
    Hi Guys, I'm interested in buying the 2016 CX5 and I did a test drive of its 2.0L. And i would just like to ask the opinion of owners who have that variant. Did you ever feel that the engine was underpowered? especially during overtaking and when the car is full of people? During the test i really had to floor it, or have to put in sports mode to really feel the pull.

    Also, was thinking if its worth the extra 200k for the upgrade to the 2.5L AWD.

    Thank you guys in advance! Hope i can hear from you soon

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    My wife got the pre facelift AWD cx-5 last year, for me at that time the price difference between the 2.0 and 2.5 was worth it ( plus at that time the AWD only has the 50% down 0% interest ). This time, looking at their online brochure the AWD differs only on the engine, transmission, wheel size, sunroof, BOSE sound system and keyless entry. Parang mas sulit si 2016 2.0, ang dami panu nadagdag sa kanya compared to the AWD.

  2. Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,452
    #1902
    Quote Originally Posted by keithchan View Post
    Hi Guys, I'm interested in buying the 2016 CX5 and I did a test drive of its 2.0L. And i would just like to ask the opinion of owners who have that variant. Did you ever feel that the engine was underpowered? especially during overtaking and when the car is full of people? During the test i really had to floor it, or have to put in sports mode to really feel the pull.

    Also, was thinking if its worth the extra 200k for the upgrade to the 2.5L AWD.

    Thank you guys in advance! Hope i can hear from you soon

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    if you're concerned that the 2.0 variant is lacking in horses, i think you should go for the 2.5 if money is not an issue

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by keithchan View Post
    Hi Guys, I'm interested in buying the 2016 CX5 and I did a test drive of its 2.0L. And i would just like to ask the opinion of owners who have that variant. Did you ever feel that the engine was underpowered? especially during overtaking and when the car is full of people? During the test i really had to floor it, or have to put in sports mode to really feel the pull.

    Also, was thinking if its worth the extra 200k for the upgrade to the 2.5L AWD.

    Thank you guys in advance! Hope i can hear from you soon

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    if you're concerned that the 2.0 variant is lacking in horses, i think you should go for the 2.5 if money is not an issue

  3. Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    17,314
    #1903
    If you're concerned with power, get a Forester XT.

  4. Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    27,624
    #1904
    Quote Originally Posted by jut703 View Post
    If you're concerned with power, get a Forester XT.
    The cvt oil change from subaru dealers are nuts. All the fc gains completely negated.

    For 1.7m the cx5 is the best in class imo. Worry free maintenance for 3 yrs with the exception of that 15/20k battery.

    Fully loaded japanese made kodo.

  5. Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    17,314
    #1905
    No doubt the CX5 is cheaper to buy and run. But the FXT is much faster and much more spacious, and to me, more good looking.

    The CX5 2.5 on the other hand isn't all that convincing over the 2.0, save for the rims. I'd get a 2.0 CX5 instead, then look for 2.5 rims. Only thing I don't like with the 2.0 is that its long second gear means low-speed overtaking is awkward, but if you overtake from 60 kph upwards, it's peppy enough.

  6. Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    10,280
    #1906
    Mazda CX-5 looks better than the Subaru Forester. The old Subaru Forester looked better than the current one.

  7. Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    25,218
    #1907
    Quote Originally Posted by Walter View Post
    Mazda CX-5 looks better than the Subaru Forester. The old Subaru Forester looked better than the current one.
    I agree, the CX5 is definitely better. But beauty is in the eyes of the beholder wika nga nila. hehe




  8. Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    343
    #1908
    Quote Originally Posted by Ry_Tower View Post
    I agree, the CX5 is definitely better. But beauty is in the eyes of the beholder wika nga nila. hehe



    Just going to leave it here...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails 1436166302746.jpg   1436166319445.jpg   1436166336687.jpg   1436166350755.jpg  

  9. Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,161
    #1909
    Nag test drive ako 2 days ago...parang mas prefer ko ang hyundai tucson.

    Posted via Tsikot Mobile App

  10. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    847
    #1910
    How about the Escape?

Mazda CX-5