100% pure BS.
Manufacturing processes are the same, whichever assembly line the car comes off of. It would cost Honda
more money, actually, to assemble the car differently in different plants, because that would force them to use different parts.
The only difference between locally built Hondas and foreign built Hondas would be the suppliers used for such items as exhausts, batteries, rubber trim, tires and glass... items needed to keep up the amount of local content required to have the vehicle declared as SKD rather than CBU... but even then, many of these parts are imported and the amount of local involvement is merely in the assembly process.
Which is why some people complain about trim and fitment issues on certain models. The location of the plant matters when you're talking about wiring, rubber trim, panel fitment, etcetera... this is where you see how good an assembly line is.
But it's complete bullsh*t to say that cars are structurally stronger or weaker depending on where they're made. Honda unibodies all come off the same line, for reasons of economy of scale. All we do here is stick everything onto the bodies, doors, front fenders, hood, glass, suspension, engine, etcetera. The unibody itself (ROOF INCLUDED) is imported.
But he's a salesman... if he actually knew anything about structural integrity, he'd be a plant engineer... now, wouldn't he?
