Results 21 to 30 of 132
-
November 11th, 2007 10:49 PM #21
Some people can so so irresponsible as long as they feel good, feel important, show that they can burn money. HID is a very good technology as long as it is used right.
-
November 12th, 2007 11:12 PM #22
mga guys (especially sa mga based abroad), itong nag post na ito eh siguradong biktima ng pangbubulag ng mga ogag n owners ng HID na lights. dito kasi sa Manila maraming nagpapakabit nyan. alam ko nag post na ako dati sa isang similar thread na iyong mga bagong sasakyan lalo na iyong mga luxury vehicles eh naka HID. pag stock HID na iyong vehicle chances are di ito nakakabulag at ok ito sa pangdrive, ang problema talaga iyong mga ogag na nagpakabit at hindi naman maganda iyong pagpapakabit - oh yes that's reality!
so instead of making sarcastic comments sa threadstarter unawain natin sya mga peeps kasi alam naman natin (especially sa mga local peeps based here) na maraming mga nakiki-uso na basta lang maikabit eh ok na, wala silang pakialam kung nakaka-gambala na pala sila ng tao dahil hindi maayos ang pagpapakabit ng kanilang ilaw. Ang nakakabwisit pa dun napakatindi ng tint tapos bubulagan ka pa.
-
Tsikot Member Rank 2
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Posts
- 675
November 12th, 2007 11:52 PM #23Not that I advocate or promote dark tints either, but some people have dark tints for security reasons. Uso rin kasi sa atin ang kidnapping. In my tita's place sa sultan kudarat, kidnapping is quite common, kaya everyone puts really dark tints sa windshield para di makita from the outside kung yung target person for kidnapping is inside the car.
-
-
November 13th, 2007 02:05 PM #25
-
November 13th, 2007 02:08 PM #26
ang dapat lang sisihin dito yung mga installer na bobo at yung nagpakabit ng walang paki alam sa ibang motorist
-
Tsikot Member Rank 3
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Posts
- 734
November 13th, 2007 02:11 PM #27para sakin ok lng naman yun mga naka hid na cars ganda tignan. ang hindi lang maganda at kaasar ay yun mga nakahid tapos hindi man lng naka-aim dun sa ground kundi naka-aim dun sa kaharap na sasakyan na para bang sarao jeep. lalo na yun mga naka suv ang taas na nga nakatapat pa dun sa kaharap na oto yun ilaw. pasaway talaga!
-
November 13th, 2007 02:31 PM #28
HIDs or not, once nasilaw ako todo na rin ang osram silverstar ko….
Ramdam niya rin yun ayaw at gusto niya…. ogag siya eh
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Posts
- 51
November 13th, 2007 02:31 PM #29Sana nga HID should be banned. Some people may justify using HID but I personally dont see any justifiable reason for using HID lamps that blinds drivers of vehicles coming from opposite direction. What with traffic in metro manila or urban streets usually at close quarters most of the times and very very few city streets that are not well lighted. That is why I can only surmise that people using HIDs are just "kulang sa pansin" or simply want to be different at the expense of other people's safety.
But I believe HID will be very helpful in rural settings, especially in long lonely, poorly lighted, highways where vehicles are few and far between. Even in areas where fogs often dawns on streets and highways. Do we have fogs in Metro Manila? I wonder!
Proper use? What may be proper to some may appear improper to others. Forgetting to dim when necessary is often the excuse. But damage may be disastrous at the receiving end.
Banned? absolutely in the metro.
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Posts
- 51
November 13th, 2007 02:40 PM #30Mind you this is a normal reaction. I myself finds this irresistible when an opposite vehicle uses high beam even in close quarter traffic. I cant help but turn or clicker my high beam too, no matter how faint it is.
But this, I mean no offense to XTO, more than supports my position for a total ban of HID's in the metro.
The backup charger finally arrived. Here are my findings and conclusion at the end:
My Dongfeng Nanobox - a case study of an electric...