Results 31 to 36 of 36
-
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Posts
- 89
February 4th, 2009 11:10 AM #32heheh i dont think mag aaply yan. nakabanga ako ng motor eh. pero siya pa nag bayad sa akin ng 3k para sa particpation fee sa insurance. eh panu b naman, go na ako tapos stop sa kanila dumiretso pa, ayun ang bilis ng accelaration ko bumangga tuloy ako sa kanya. hehe.. umikot ikot p siya pero buti sugat lang. kung may nangyari iba, ako tlga ang lagot
-
February 4th, 2009 03:01 PM #33
^^^ excuse me, sa thailand po yata yong sinasabing walang kasalanan motorcycles in case may banggaan...
-
February 6th, 2009 12:36 PM #34
I think there is indeed a presumption that the driver of the vehicle behind in a collision is at fault on the premise that both vehicles are moving forward and that the driver at the back would be in a better position to avoid the accident. However, this presumption is not conclusive but merely disputable. Presented with contrary evidence the investigating officer should take a neutral stance on such a case.
So, really it is not a law but merely a disputable legal presumption. Kaya nga lang base sa nangyari malamang magsisinungaling ng husto yung driver ng van at kung yung traffic enforcer eh, medyo corrupt, malamang magkaroon pa ng kaso.
That's why I think in keeping your cool and letting it go was the best way to handle the situation. In my experience, minor accident with little damage should always be handled like so. I don't trust traffic enforcers anymore. They will most like try to profit from your misfortune in cahoots with the other party especially kung hanap dilihensya rin yung kabila.
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Posts
- 329
-
February 9th, 2009 12:21 PM #36
Sa Rules of Court yung mga legal presumptions pero not really sure sa rear vehicle presumption.
Be careful with channels like "China Observer" on YouTube. There is a clear bias in their posts and...
Xiaomi E-Car