Results 11 to 20 of 57
-
April 16th, 2005 01:23 PM #11Originally Posted by mbt
-
April 16th, 2005 01:41 PM #12
Like bluebimmer said if money is no object I also like to have an 1000HP or more.but Im already satisfied putting an H22 or B20 engine with a HP of 500hp or more on a honda civic hatchback
-
April 16th, 2005 01:47 PM #13Originally Posted by gearspeed
-
April 16th, 2005 02:02 PM #14
meron ako dito 2 units 4500 hp 16 cylinder diesel roots blown EMD645 saka 2 units 2050 hp 12 cylinder diesel roots blown EMD645, gusto nyo kabit nyo sa car nyo ehehehehe! kaya lang dapat 18 wheeler car nyo to carry the weight!
-
April 16th, 2005 02:12 PM #15
In the US, the Mazda3 has a variant. Mazda3 with a 2.0 turbo AWD. I think it was 240HP and cheaper than the Mitsu EVO. That would be a hoot to drive around Metro Manila. :D
-
April 16th, 2005 02:40 PM #16
internal combustion engines need to have very high HP ratings because they have a non-optimal torque curve, and maximum output happens at high RPMs whereas most of the time you're driving at low RPMs.
the typical engine (even a turbo) would have peak HP output at say 4500rpm or 6000rpm, but if you look at the power curve, at 2000rpm it's only putting out 30% to 40% of peak power. so a 200hp car would be "only" 60-80hp at low RPMs where it counts. that's why the peak output has to be so high.
i read an article about a guy who made a car that dusts most supercars for breakfast (3.9s 0-60mph). it "only" had a 320hp engine (actually four electric motors of 80hp each) and about 1000 notebook li-ion batteries for power.
series-wound electric motors put out "nearly infinite" torque when their rotor is stalled, limited only by the amount of current you can put into them, and whether they will melt down or not. and their power curve is flat. this is why they are very popular for transport applications (e.g. electric car, MRT, Arleigh Burke class guided missile destroyer... although note the older Perry class frigates and Spruance DDG's use GE turbines, not electric drive)
the future isn't internal combustion, it's electric.
-
April 16th, 2005 02:41 PM #17
GH, the 2.0 mazda in the US is not afaik AWD. it's something along the lines of the mazdaspeed 2003.5, the 2.0 turbo AWD is the mazda6. not yet ought AFAIK...
-
April 16th, 2005 02:43 PM #18
isa pa pala.. electric transport needs no tranny or clutch, which is also an HP-wasting component... you can fine-control the speed using just pulse width modulation.
-
April 16th, 2005 02:45 PM #19
When it comes to horsepower, how high is enough?
when it can manage 0~100KMH * 3.9sec less
sporty if 7.0sec
and enough/average * 10sec..>>hehe
-
April 16th, 2005 02:54 PM #20
Problem with "pure" electric cars is charging time, takes too long to charge... AFAIK.
Where in throttle body is the adjustment the bizscew or on fix SAS
high idle RPM at engine start