LOL!!!!!
That is a very simple way of looking at things.
Let us try to remember that - while we can sit here now and look back at the Asian Financial Crisis, which led to the difficulties that the entire continent of Asia felt (not just Fil-Estate and CAP), as the sign that investments in real estate should never have been made in preparation of the said financial crisis - HINDSIGHT is always 20/20.
You can sit here and say "investments made here were wrong"and "investments made there were poor decisions" - but the fact of the matter is the investments were made BEFORE the Financial Crisis, and there was no way to tell that that the crisis was going to happen.
Do you think, Mr. Uls, that you would have been able to foresee such an occurrence if you were the one in charge of making investments? If so, then perhaps somebody should hire you to predict the futures and outcomes in the business and financial world. You would be a valuable asset to any company... to any country, even. Maybe then people would take notice of you as the next Nostradamus and be talking about your wonderful powers of prediction for the next 500 years.
Unfortunately, Mr. Uls, all we have seen from you here is your knack for "postdiction" (as opposed to prediction). But sadly, anybody could do that.
All joking aside, Uls, it seems to me that you are assuming that CAP intentionally sunk funds into Fil-Estate in order to "get away with" some sort of ploy to fool the people.
Here is what you should research before you spout off statements without understanding what you are getting into.
Take a good long look at CAP's track record before the skyrocketing of tuition fees, the Asian Financial Crisis, and before the years that the Actuarial Reserve Liability or ARL was wrongly applied to the formula for calculating the trust funds and reserves of CAP. If CAP was a scam, a ponzi scheme, or a simple tool for taking the money of the masses and stashing it away in personal bank accounts - would it have lasted 24 YEARS, paid over 13 BILLION PESOS in tuition fees, and helped thousands upon thousands of students graduate college?
If the owners and directors of CAP were such shameless people overrun by greed, would they be sitting here trying to pay back its planholders? In fact, CAP is the ONLY PRENEED COMPANY paying planholders back. If they really wanted, the owners could have just closed shop, and, for those of you who are not aware of basic CORPORATE law, since CAP is a CORPORATION, the liability of CAP to its planholders DOES NOT transfer to its owners and members - which means that they would have walked away without a single worry and every single centavo in their pockets.
But no, CAP remains open. This is a decision that is straining the company financially, exhausting its manpower, resources, and all its time in trying to find ways to earn the money to REPAY its planholders. The owners of CAP agree that it is their responsibility to give back to its full-paid planholders and have already paid out almost 2 BILLION PESOS in planholder reimbursements since 2007.
Of course, these reimbursements take time to process because of the enormous backlog of planholders claiming checks - but at least the company is there and is not running away from what it feels is its responsibility to give back.
If anything - that speaks of a high level of INTEGRITY within the upper management of CAP.
Once again, we can truly understand why there are negative feelings toward what happened... but people must remember that CAP did NOT want this to happen. Why would they want this to happen? This is affecting them just as much, if not more, than the planholders.
Please, lets be realistic here. CAP needed to make investments in order to grow their reserves - and they made all the decisions necessary. Why not invest in Fil-Estate, a company they can easily monitor, and whose projects were the talk of the town in those days - something seen universally as a good investment to be made?
Then the crisis hit and everybody suffered. Fil-Estate, Megaworld, Ayala... everybody. Then all of a sudden the sudden implementation of the ARL by certain politicians to measure the company's finances halted everything CAP was doing to alleviate the situation - only to be indicated later on by the NEWLY INSTATED PRE NEED CODE that the ARL was NOT the correct formula to implement on Pre-Need firms.
If anything... CAP, as well as its planholders, are victims all on the same boat. Nevertheless, CAP continues to pay planholders back.
Visit www.cap.com.ph/education/home.htm for further information regarding unclaimed checks.
Visit www.captruth.webs.com for ADDITIONAL information regarding CAP, as well as news articles written about CAP's habit of paying back its planholders.



Reply With Quote
Peace everyone.





