New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
  1. Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    134
    #1
    Consider the following figures:

    Trip Time: 3 hours
    Trip Distance: 135km

    So by simple math, ang average speed is 45kph for the entire trip.

    What would yield better fuel economy:

    1) Doing 45kph consistently for the entire 3 hours

    OR

    2) Doing a mix of 10kph for 30 mins then 80kph for 30 mins alternately for 3 hours?

    Just asking because I wanted to know how scenario 2 affects my fuel economy.

    Kasi I went on a trip from Pasig to Nuvali and back last Saturday, which yielded the following figures:

    Trip Time = 3:54
    Trip Dist = 92.1 km
    Ave Speed = 23.62 kph
    Fuel Cons = 13.33 km/L
    Car = 2012 Kia Rio 1.4 EX AT Sedan

    Considering nag-SLEX ako hitting 100kph at times, mabagal pa din yung average speed because of the very heavy traffic in the Pasig area + moderate traffic in Sta Rosa.

  2. Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    1,945
    #2
    i dont know if i'm right on this but i think 1st and 2nd gears consume more gas than 3rd, 4th onwards... this is why everytime you get stuck in traffic, you consume more gasoline than the average mix driving.

  3. Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    22,704
    #3
    Try sticking to 80 km/h for the flat portions. Whatever is the lowest speed you can hold in 4th gear (meaning... the transmission doesn't fluctuate between 4th and 3rd and you don't lose speed) is the best on the highway.

    SLEX is a challenge because of hills. I try to accelerate going down the gentle slope before the hills at Susana, then semi-coast (on low throttle) to the tops of those hills (hitting as low as 60-70 km/h by the top), then try to regain the momentum on the downhill stretch to Alabang.

    Ang pagbalik ng comeback...

  4. Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    2,267
    #4
    constant speed will yield better fuel economy.
    acceleration consumes more fuel. so if you alternately go from slow to fast driving, you have more instances of acceleration.

    but in reality, you seldom drive on constant speed unless you are always on an expressway.

  5. Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    22,704
    #5
    You can use mixed speeds and gain decent economy. The concept is called "Pulse and Glide" by hypermilers. You pulse (accelerate) up to a set speed and glide down to a lower target speed in neutral or... in more extreme cases... with the engine off.

    P&G in neutral yields better economy than steady state. P&G with the engine off can give you incredible economy... but this is very difficult to do and very dangerous... and definitely not recommended with an AT.

    Still... whether you follow steady state or P&G, the principles for hills remains the same. DO NOT maintain speed up the hill. This is a waste of gas. Let gravity bleed off your speed, then gain it back on the way down.

    Ang pagbalik ng comeback...

  6. Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    134
    #6
    Quote Originally Posted by fourtheboys96 View Post
    constant speed will yield better fuel economy.
    acceleration consumes more fuel. so if you alternately go from slow to fast driving, you have more instances of acceleration.
    ok thanks! this is what I wanted to know

  7. Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,407
    #7
    ^ meron din yatang impact ang rpm

    during cruising speed of ~80kph, maintain a max of ~2000rpm. so pitik-pitik lang sa pedal. equivalent yata yan ng p&g

  8. Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,407
    #8
    double post
    Last edited by dfopiso; September 17th, 2012 at 05:29 PM.

  9. Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    39,162
    #9
    Quote Originally Posted by niky View Post

    Still... whether you follow steady state or P&G, the principles for hills remains the same. DO NOT maintain speed up the hill. This is a waste of gas. Let gravity bleed off your speed, then gain it back on the way down.
    That is why driving with autocruise on going uphill is a surreal experience.... The engine RPM compensates (i.e. revs higher) for the 'loss' in speed...

    16.9K:spam:

  10. Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    22,704
    #10
    That's why you should only use cruise control on a relatively flat and long stretch of road.

    Quote Originally Posted by dfopiso View Post
    ^ meron din yatang impact ang rpm

    during cruising speed of ~80kph, maintain a max of ~2000rpm. so pitik-pitik lang sa pedal. equivalent yata yan ng p&g
    Ideally, no need to keep pressing harder to bring speed back up. What you do is let it coast down for a while then pulse once and let off again.

    Best is if you can find the sweet spot where the lightest of pedal pressures will allow you to maintain speed on a flat stretch. Very hard to do in practice, because very few roads are completely level. Even on the NLEX, there are portions where you're going slightly uphill or down hill.

    Ang pagbalik ng comeback...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

What yields better fc: Constant speed throughout trip, or mixed fast/slow driving?