Toyota Fortuner vs. 2008 Mitsubishi Montero Sport

[kompressor]

Masasabi kong pangit ang isang bagay pag LAHAT ng tao pangit ang tingin. Parang utot. Lahat pag nakaamoy iisa ang sasabihin....mabaho.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder ika nga....


Kaso hindi ganun ang case sa MS eh. Marami rin namang nagagandahan sa MS.

[my4tuner]

* my4tuner: benta mo na yang fortuner mo bili ka na ng montero hahaha

fuzion like rear? di kaya just check it clearly at siguraduhin mong wala kang muta nun'

ang laki kaya ng difference compared to fuzion

Hijo, My eyes are in perfect vision. No thanks. Not in a gazillion years. I am very much contented with my 2.5 d4d Fort "fuel effecient"

* projector, i agree. There will always be an aftermarket parts to remedy yung tagtag. Changing the shocks, springs, " cheapest is lowering the tire pressure from 32 to 30 psi (well it depends on which you want to compromise ride or fuel efficiency) using Nitrogen instead of Oxygen greatly improves the ride quality.

MS and Fort will have there flaws and it would take time to make it close to perfect. Btw, there is no perfect machine for that matter. Regardless of what we own, "Let us just enjoy the ride"

[meldy12]

good discussion of aesthetic, specification of 2 suv. its good to know the different perspective ng mga tsikoteers. but mahirap to compare two things without a common parameter.

[farlane]

built, aftersales support, specs and overall value for money are my considerations for choosing a car. I have always favored toyota and honda for this... but recently, toyota's high price with low specitfication has shifted my preference for the MS. looks are so subjective. There should really be no debate on which is nicer looking.

[farlane]

Hijo, My eyes are in perfect vision. No thanks. Not in a gazillion years. I am very much contented with my 2.5 d4d Fort "fuel effecient"

* projector, i agree. There will always be an aftermarket parts to remedy yung tagtag. Changing the shocks, springs, " cheapest is lowering the tire pressure from 32 to 30 psi (well it depends on which you want to compromise ride or fuel efficiency) using Nitrogen instead of Oxygen greatly improves the ride quality.

MS and Fort will have there flaws and it would take time to make it close to perfect. Btw, there is no perfect machine for that matter. Regardless of what we own, "Let us just enjoy the ride"

i believe oxygen is not used in tire. it supports combustion. compressed air is what is universally used.

[batangmahal]

MS and Fort will have there flaws and it would take time to make it close to perfect. Btw, there is no perfect machine for that matter. Regardless of what we own, "Let us just enjoy the ride"

hehe, live and let live na lang. there's no perfect machine per se. but of course, there can always be a perfect ride for each one's taste! peace!

[ianmitsulancer]

*batangmahal- i agree with u... i'll drink to that.

*tamb0k- isali mo rin yun rear fascia picture of the Lancer EX- hehehehe...

[alainroyce]

my4tuner * Are you satisfied to your 4X2 with 2.5 engine? Hindi ba sya Under power ?.. for me its under power with only 102 PS and 260 of torque non intercooler... this is the slowest SUV in the market today ...

[snake888]

I'll go for the new Montero. I just hope the cost of maintenance is cheaper now for Mitsubishi. I owned a Civic and a Lancer before and believe it or not the cost of maintenance of a Civic is cheaper than the Lancer.

[proheart]

we've checked both these cars before deciding what to get.
MS is a good choice, but we get the Fortuner, better choice.:thumbup: