Results 1 to 10 of 42
Hybrid View
-
January 10th, 2007 02:58 PM #1
I need your opinion mga daddy with SUVs. Is it still worth to hava a Pajero FM bago mahuli ang lahat since pawala na ang brand new nito? One thing I like is the space. Other newer ones within the price range only
sits 5. Kahit medyo luma na ang looks but still it’s a Pajero.
Added question, CRDi na ba ang 4m40 or simply Direct Injection? Since wala nang M/T hindi ba siya underpowered?
Sorry for those repeating questions that could be found in previous Pajero threads.
THANKS
-
January 10th, 2007 03:02 PM #2
-
January 10th, 2007 03:29 PM #3
Compared to vehicles like the Fortuner, it really is underpowered, but I find it sufficient for daily use.
It's more loaded than the Fort, with land meter displays, tire pressure monitor, multi-mode ECT (power - normal - hold modes for the transmission) and suspension settings (comfort - normal - hard... I prefer hard). The ride is better than the Fortuner's, definitely.
I can't remember if the current one has side-facing third row seats or not... If it does, I prefer that set-up to the Fortuner's. The Fortuner's third row is comfortable in terms of cushioning, but the seats are big and bulky, limiting legroom and cargo space.
It's still a lot of money, though, for such an old design, and it has no 4x4 option.
Ang pagbalik ng comeback...
-
January 10th, 2007 04:12 PM #4
It's a Php1.8M AUV . hehehe. If you really like the Pajero, it's your chance to own a piece of history. The unavailability of 4wd or any traction-aiding device means it won't work for me. But on traction sufficent surfaces, it can still haul and tow like its 4x4 siblings.
On the road, almost any car-based SUV will trump it in terms of ride and handling. The interior is dated. It remains essentially unchanged since the GEN II's launch in '92.
Yes, it has more features than the Fortuner except for not having a passenger airbag and ABS. I also hear it's still got more 'street cred' among non-enthusiasts (people who don't know s*it about cars).
Power is relative. For me the 125bhp 4m40 4a/t combo is adequate. Of course a Fortuner with a 160bhp 3.0 engine will easily leave it behind. But the Pajero's drivetrain has proven itself to be bulletproof and idiotproof over the years.
The units being sold now have forward facing seats upholstered in a leather/suede combo. DVD entertainment is now standard, AFAIK. As well as the bumper overrided and 'Pajero' lower door graphics which were [expensive] options during the earlier days.
http://docotep.multiply.com/
Need an Ambulance? We sell Zic Brand Oils and Lubricants. Please PM me.
-
January 10th, 2007 04:25 PM #5
in my opinion, the look of this pajero is a classic/modern at the same time. it looks good. but for the price, its not worth it. as people mentioned, i would rather get the fortuner or other 4x4 suv.
-
-
Tsikot Member Rank 4
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Posts
- 1,054
January 11th, 2007 03:17 PM #7why bother for this ? its really old plus the toyota fortuner is almost 200k cheaper, its newer, stronger, seats the same amount of people, same full sized suv, same 4x4 or 4x2 for the gas version which is much more cheaper ... theres really no sense in getting this pajero anymore
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Oct 2002
- Posts
- 10,620
January 11th, 2007 03:31 PM #8at 1.8M its not worth it...better look for a pre owned with relatively low mileage...if you really want the paj FM...less than 1M i pressume
-
Tsikot Member Rank 4
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Posts
- 1,054
January 11th, 2007 03:35 PM #9if looks lang habol mo then why dont you just get or look for the previous model range rover ... its around 800k for the 4.4 hse V8 while the diesel goes for around 1.1m
a range rover is a range rover khit ano itabi m sa range rover wala masasabi mga tao
-
January 12th, 2007 01:39 AM #10
hmmm... methinks it's time to get a new car... but in truth, it's only the last digit that i'm...
Special Plates