New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 31
  1. Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    58
    #21
    Quote Originally Posted by pajerokid View Post
    Hmm.. i get around 530kms to a full tank with my 4m40AT purely city driven.
    how does that translate to km/l? Sorry I'm not familiar with the full tank capacity of the field masters. I get around 8.8km/l on my 2door gen 1 montero/pajero AT. It was originally a 2.0 gas then converted to 4d56 turbo intercooler. fast little beast, hehe.

  2. Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    6,940
    #22
    In terms of maintenance naman how does the two compare.

  3. Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    3,346
    #23
    Quote Originally Posted by adventure View Post
    wala po ba tyo pix ng 4m40


    Local Pajero Gen 2.5 with 4M40 looks like this one. But as you can see, this model is the V6 model.

    Quote Originally Posted by oliver1013 View Post
    In terms of maintenance naman how does the two compare.
    4D56 is more cheaper to maintain because it is more smaller compared to the 2800cc of the 4M40.
    iam3739.com

  4. Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    44
    #24
    i drive a 2nd gen strada, no comment ako sa performance, puno man ng karga di nagbabago ang takbo, ewan ko lang sa pajero.

  5. #25
    mas magaan ang curb wt ng strada than a pajero..pero mataas ang net capacity at gross-wt ng strada than a pajero..

    about the pic--ganyan na ganyan ang local gen2.5 pajero MINUS:

    1. fender mirror
    2. change the side sticker to: 2800 INTERCOOLER TURBO
    3. front bumper overider

  6. Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    46
    #26
    The parts for a 4M40 is more expensive than that of a 4D56. 4M40 has bigger displacement so more horses and more horses means more horses to get thirsty but the best is to use both engines in the same road conditions and driving habits to get a more precise fuel consumption comparison. One can say he gets 8km/liter city driving and another can say he gets 9km/liter but the route they take and driving habits are different so you can't really make an accurate comparison.

    Can anyone confirm if the new Strada 2.5L CRDi engine is still using the same block as the 4D56? Or the Hyundai Starex GRX 2.5L CRDi?

  7. Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    357
    #27
    Quote Originally Posted by Drave View Post
    Yan din ang sabi ng isang chief mechanic dito sa mitsu casa. Mas gusto daw niya ang 4D56 kasi belt driven kaya mas tahimik. Ang 4M40 at 4M41 ay chain driven, tahimik sa simula, pero pag nagtagal na, mga 80-100k kms, mas maingay na kesa 4D56. Madali naman daw magpalit ng belt.

    Ang ayoko lang sa 4D56 ay mas-mausok at mas mahina ang power (older generation).
    if you think your 4M40 has become noisier than it was when it was new, try checking the timing chain tensioners, perhaps those timing chain tensioners require replacement ... HTH

  8. Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    153
    #28
    4M40


    • Engine type — Inline 4 cylinder SOHC
    • Displacement — 2835 cc
    • Bore — 95 mm
    • Stroke — 100 mm
    • Fuel type — Diesel


    Intercooled turbo



    • Fuel system — Distributor type injection pump
    • Compression ratio — 21:1
    • Power — 92 kW (125 PS) at 4000 rpm
    • Torque — 294 N·m (217 lb·ft) at 2000 rpm


    Intercooled turbo



    • Fuel system — Electronic control type distribution type jet pump
    • Compression ratio — 21:1
    • Power — 103 kW (140 PS) at 4000 rpm
    • Torque — 314 N·m (232 lb·ft) at 2000 rpm

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubishi_4M4_engine


    4D56


    Displacement - 2476 cc
    Bore - 91.1 mm
    Stroke - 95.0 mm
    Fuel type - Diesel


    Non-Turbo



    • Power - 51 kW (79 PS) at 4200 rpm
    • Torque - 143 N·m (105 ft·lbf) at 2500 rpm
    • Engine type - Inline 4 cylinder SOHC
    • Fuel system - Distribution type jet pump
    • Compression ratio - 21:1


    Turbo



    • Power - 103hp at 4000 rpm
    • Torque - 287 N·m (232 ft·lbf) at 2000 rpm
    • Engine type - Inline 4 cylinder SOHC
    • Fuel system - Distribution type jet pump
    • Compression ratio - 21:1


    Intercooled Turbo (1st Generation CRDi)



    • Power - 99 kW (134 PS) at 4000 rpm
    • Torque - 298 N·m (224 ft·lbf) at 2000 rpm
    • Engine type - Inline 4 cylinder 8-big valve, small-block, SOHC
    • Fuel system - 1st Generation CRDi Electronically Controlled Distributor type injection pump
    • Compression ratio - 21:1


    2nd Gen Common rail intercooled turbo



    • Power - 105 kW (141 PS) - 131 kw (178 PS) at 4000 rpm
    • Torque - 321 N·m (223 ft·lbf) - 400 N·m at 2000 rpm
    • Engine type - Inline 4 cylinder DOHC
    • Fuel system - 2nd Generation Common rail direct injection
    • Compression ratio - 17:1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubi...ration_CRDi.29

  9. Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    2,127
    #29
    Bakit kaya parang halos magkatunog yung 4d56 at 4m40? Lol.

  10. Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,118
    #30
    Quote Originally Posted by GTcervan View Post
    Bakit kaya parang halos magkatunog yung 4d56 at 4m40? Lol.
    Update ata niyang 4D56 yung 4M40 kaya may carryover na characteristics. Unlike 4N15 na worlds apart yung difference.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Mitsubishi's 4M40 or 4D56?