Results 1 to 10 of 19
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2015
- Posts
- 28
July 15th, 2015 06:38 PM #1Need help over choosing which car. I know these cars are not of the same category. But both friend of mine are offering a 2nd hand units. These are the FD 2009 1.8s MT priced at 490k and the Tucson 2011 GL MT at 550k. I want practicality and reliability and ease of maintenance. Mostly for city use lang. Is it a wise choice to still go for the civic or the newer tucson nalang?
-
Tsikot Member Rank 2
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Posts
- 3,774
July 15th, 2015 08:35 PM #2question is, what is your requirement in a vehicle?
will you need higher ground clearance for flood or do you want porma? do you need a sedan or so you need a bigger car for your travels?
up to you but it depends on what you need.
-
July 16th, 2015 03:46 PM #3
i would still go for the Civic.
mas maganda ang driving comfort nya eh.
but then, i would agree with sirkosero.... would you need a higher ground clearance?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
i would still go for the Civic.
mas maganda ang driving comfort nya eh.
but then, i would agree with sirkosero.... would you need a higher ground clearance?
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2015
- Posts
- 28
July 16th, 2015 03:59 PM #4Thank you for this. I'm sold on getting the civic already. I wont be needing much of the ground clearance since we live on a less flooded area. just occasional trips on a less paved roads.
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Posts
- 466
July 16th, 2015 05:26 PM #5previously owned both civic (2007) and tucson (2010) but both in A/T. actually had less problems with the tucson compared to the FD. comparable fuel consumption. same resale value (percentage wise). the tucson is more utilitarian lang. the FD i would say has more comfortable seats.
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2015
- Posts
- 28
July 17th, 2015 02:47 AM #6I've heard 06 to 07 FD are quite problematic. But beyond that especially the MMC are already reliable. I am buying the MMC FD by the way. Both cars have almost 3 yrs gap but have almost the same resale value. I would still go for the civic due to comfort in driving as you previously mentioned since i will be using it for home to office vice versa only. Thank you.
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2014
- Posts
- 414
July 17th, 2015 09:26 AM #7We have a 2010 1.8S AT and a 2012 Tucson 2.0 CRDi AT. Both are perky and fun to drive. Its a matter of preference if you want a low or high rider. Of course the diesel Tucson has better FC.
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Posts
- 4,447
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2014
- Posts
- 414
July 17th, 2015 02:20 PM #9
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2015
- Posts
- 28
July 17th, 2015 03:28 PM #10In terms of maintenance cost, does the civic FD have the advantage over the tucson or are they relatively the same?
That was the high mileage cars thread:...
The Toyota Fortuner has landed (fortuner pics at...