Choosing the best 2016 compact crossover

[dreamur]

Forester XT or base forester?

Top end 2.4 cr v or base version?

Forester 2.0 Premium, CRV S and CX5 FWD Pro

Sent from my SM-N910C using Tapatalk

[Mguy]

IMO, there is a reason why the CRV is a best seller throughout the years. We all know that it is very spacious, probably the most spacious of all 3, reliable and very comfortable. But most probably its the peace of mind that you could keep the car running for years and years.

[jut703]

IMO, there is a reason why the CRV is a best seller throughout the years. We all know that it is very spacious, probably the most spacious of all 3, reliable and very comfortable. But most probably its the peace of mind that you could keep the car running for years and years.

No longer a best seller. Forester leads CUV sales, while the CRV only comes in 3rd after the Tucson. The Forester is also more spacious than the CRV, but yes the CRV is also big inside.

No doubt the 1st and 2nd gen CRVs were class leaders, but Honda's glory days have faded and the CRV no longer stands out in the CUV crowd. Not a bad car, but why settle when the Forester and CX5 are better for the same price. Heck, I'd say the RAV4, X-Trail, and new Tucson are better than the CRV. Have driven all except the new Tucson but have driven the old one and that carryover CRDi engine alone makes it better than the CRV.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[EQAddict]

Coming from someone who has owned three subaru's before ( previous gen forester XT, current forester XT and previous legacy turbo) ....... I ain't buying a subaru without a turbo. The chassis dynamics are wasted on its anemic NA engine. Turbo or bust.

Save a little more and go for the XT. You won't regret it.




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[screws]

Coming from someone who has owned three subaru's before ( previous gen forester XT, current forester XT and previous legacy turbo) ....... I ain't buying a subaru without a turbo. The chassis dynamics are wasted on its anemic NA engine. Turbo or bust.

Save a little more and go for the XT. You won't regret it.




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

i think you mean spend more... :D

[EQAddict]

You're correct. I meant spend a little more


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[screws]

was just kidding EQ.

anyway, i will go against everyone here and choose crv because its boring, laid back and easy going. i mean if i buy any econobox on this segment, i wont be looking for something i will be throwing around corners or go on spirited driving. theres another car for that. thats just me though.

[Mguy]

No longer a best seller. Forester leads CUV sales, while the CRV only comes in 3rd after the Tucson. The Forester is also more spacious than the CRV, but yes the CRV is also big inside.

No doubt the 1st and 2nd gen CRVs were class leaders, but Honda's glory days have faded and the CRV no longer stands out in the CUV crowd. Not a bad car, but why settle when the Forester and CX5 are better for the same price. Heck, I'd say the RAV4, X-Trail, and new Tucson are better than the CRV. Have driven all except the new Tucson but have driven the old one and that carryover CRDi engine alone makes it better than the CRV.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Locally probably, but still a best seller around the world. Again, its something about this car that keeps on selling good.

[boomshine]

If looks, cx5 or rav4 or tucson

[Walter]

Don't listen to EQAddict, he's a speed demon ...