Attended driving school for 7 hrs manual, it was too tiring for me tapos ang tigas pa ng clutch. Bandang huli namamatayan or nagjejerk yung kotse kasi nagmamadaling bumitaw yung paa ko sa clutch dahil sa pagod.
Then I attended 4 hours of matic, laking ginahawa sa legs ko and I was able to focus more on other stuff like cornering so in a sense I think mas secure family ko kung matic yung idridrive ko.
Bakit sa ibang bansa puro Auto Tranny na, dito sa atin mix pa rin M/T and A/T.
And most, if not all, Europeans drive better in manual-tranny; they have better skills using it than when you see the Yanks on the same set-up ;)
The Philippines is heavily-influenced by the US of A, that's why a lot of Pinoys are so much into auto-trannys where the majority's excuse is kesyo ma-traffic daw, kesyo sakit daw paa nila kaka-clutch kaya daw automatic sila hehe. This is especially common among the Manila city boys, na freno-nang-freno sa kaunting kurbada lang, lalo na sa zigzags bwahehe
Cheers!
AT snobbery is just as bad as MT snobbery.
The point that an AT is easier to drive in traffic is a valid one, if you ask me. Yes, I can drive a manual all day long, but when you're stuck in C5 at 7:30 in the evening, the convenience of an automatic is dearly missed. You wouldn't know that if you don't spend your daily routine in such conditions.
An MT driver is not superior to an AT driver. I find it shallow when people prop themselves up based on the transmission of their car.