New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 64
  1. Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    59
    #1
    Choosing between this 2 models of the Wildtrak and your comments, inputs or suggestions will be appreciated.

    is the 2.2 engine enough for 4x4?

    i will use it for city driving and occasional rough road trips like farm and agricultural lands.

    btw, i also considered toyota fj and hilux G 4x4 AT.

    thank you.

  2. Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    27,624
    #2
    the 2.2 is quieter and has less vibrations than the 3.2 - thats what the indians are saying. for city driving thats very important. fc will be lower too.

    Sent from my SM-G935F using Tsikot Forums mobile app

  3. Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    59
    #3
    Quote Originally Posted by StockEngine View Post
    the 2.2 is quieter and has less vibrations than the 3.2 - thats what the indians are saying. for city driving thats very important. fc will be lower too.

    Sent from my SM-G935F using Tsikot Forums mobile app

    thank you sir for the input.

    how about comparing it to Hilux G or Navarra?

  4. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    10,819
    #4
    not necessarily true na pag maliit makina matipid sa gasolina/diesel. icompare mo mga sedans na 1.3 vs 1.5/1.6 na models mas matipid yung bigger engines. case in point toyota vios 1.3 vs vios 1.5, mas matipid ang 1.5. yung kasi maliit na displacement hirap ang makina, mas mataas ang rev bago mag shift ang gear ng a/t. SAME VEHICLE WEIGHT LANG YAN kaya the smaller engine will have to work harder to pull the same weight.

  5. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    10,819
    #5
    baka naman yung farm road na dadaanan mo e di naman need ang 4x4? kung gravel topped na kahit 4x2 2.2 kaya na. need mo lang ng 4x4 kung mud na malalim o kaya may dadaanan ka na river na buhangin ang river bed.

  6. Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    27,624
    #6
    Quote Originally Posted by yebo View Post
    not necessarily true na pag maliit makina matipid sa gasolina/diesel. icompare mo mga sedans na 1.3 vs 1.5/1.6 na models mas matipid yung bigger engines. case in point toyota vios 1.3 vs vios 1.5, mas matipid ang 1.5. yung kasi maliit na displacement hirap ang makina, mas mataas ang rev bago mag shift ang gear ng a/t. SAME VEHICLE WEIGHT LANG YAN kaya the smaller engine will have to work harder to pull the same weight.
    diesel bro. iba and under powered petrol engine. nasa high rpm ang torque

    Sent from my SM-G935F using Tsikot Forums mobile app

  7. Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    59
    #7
    Quote Originally Posted by yebo View Post
    baka naman yung farm road na dadaanan mo e di naman need ang 4x4? kung gravel topped na kahit 4x2 2.2 kaya na. need mo lang ng 4x4 kung mud na malalim o kaya may dadaanan ka na river na buhangin ang river bed.
    thank you sir yebo sa inputs.

    actually, wala naman mud na malalim and river na dadaanan... gusto ko lang sana 4x4 para in times na need ko, 4x4 na pickup ko hehehe

  8. Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    59
    #8
    Quote Originally Posted by StockEngine View Post
    diesel bro. iba and under powered petrol engine. nasa high rpm ang torque

    Sent from my SM-G935F using Tsikot Forums mobile app

    so mas tipid po ang 2.2 compared sa 3.2?

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by StockEngine View Post
    diesel bro. iba and under powered petrol engine. nasa high rpm ang torque

    Sent from my SM-G935F using Tsikot Forums mobile app
    Quote Originally Posted by yebo View Post
    not necessarily true na pag maliit makina matipid sa gasolina/diesel. icompare mo mga sedans na 1.3 vs 1.5/1.6 na models mas matipid yung bigger engines. case in point toyota vios 1.3 vs vios 1.5, mas matipid ang 1.5. yung kasi maliit na displacement hirap ang makina, mas mataas ang rev bago mag shift ang gear ng a/t. SAME VEHICLE WEIGHT LANG YAN kaya the smaller engine will have to work harder to pull the same weight.
    so mas tipid po ang 3.2?

  9. Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    8,492
    #9
    pansin ko lang mas malakas ang hatak ng Pajero BK ko kesa sa 2016 Wildtrak considering 3 years older yun Pajero at old tech na yun pero siguro nga dahil pang rally ang Pajero eh

    pero sobra tiped neto RAnger ko grabe, mas matipid pa sa Pajero or even sa old Santa FE ko.

  10. Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    59
    #10
    Quote Originally Posted by minicarph View Post
    pansin ko lang mas malakas ang hatak ng Pajero BK ko kesa sa 2016 Wildtrak considering 3 years older yun Pajero at old tech na yun pero siguro nga dahil pang rally ang Pajero eh

    pero sobra tiped neto RAnger ko grabe, mas matipid pa sa Pajero or even sa old Santa FE ko.

    salamat sir minicarph sa input...3.2L po ba ranger nyo?

    fortuner ko 09 model sobra rin tipid pero starex 2012 ko medyo malakas sa diesel...hvx imported from Hancars.. diba pareho lang makina ng starex at Santa Fe?

  11. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    10,819
    #11
    Quote Originally Posted by the_arrow View Post
    diba pareho lang makina ng starex at Santa Fe?
    no. 2.2 sta fe and 2.5 starex. e mas malaki naman kaha ng starex kesa sa fort mo, mas malakas ang wind drag.

  12. Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    4,447
    #12
    Quote Originally Posted by yebo View Post
    no. 2.2 sta fe and 2.5 starex. e mas malaki naman kaha ng starex kesa sa fort mo, mas malakas ang wind drag.
    Tsaka ang bigat pa ng starex

    Sent from my SM-A9000 using Tapatalk

  13. Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    59
    #13
    Quote Originally Posted by dct View Post
    Tsaka ang bigat pa ng starex

    Sent from my SM-A9000 using Tapatalk
    sir dct ano po mas tipid 2.2 or 3.2?

  14. Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    27,624
    #14
    Quote Originally Posted by the_arrow View Post
    sir dct ano po mas tipid 2.2 or 3.2?
    brad..

    an idling(or crawling in traffic)2.2 4cyl engine will consume less fuel than a 3.2l 5cyl engine...

    Sent from my SM-G935F using Tsikot Forums mobile app

  15. Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    59
    #15
    Quote Originally Posted by StockEngine View Post
    brad..

    an idling(or crawling in traffic)2.2 4cyl engine will consume less fuel than a 3.2l 5cyl engine...

    Sent from my SM-G935F using Tsikot Forums mobile app

    salamat sir! e kung walang traffic? mas tipid ang 3.2l? probinsya kasi dito sa amin... d masyado traffic at puro highway driving

  16. Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    27,624
    #16
    the 2.2 will still consume less fuel.

    Sent from my SM-G935F using Tsikot Forums mobile app

  17. Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    59
    #17
    Quote Originally Posted by StockEngine View Post
    the 2.2 will still consume less fuel.

    Sent from my SM-G935F using Tsikot Forums mobile app

    salamat sir StockEngine!

  18. Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    153
    #18
    Quote Originally Posted by the_arrow View Post
    thank you sir yebo sa inputs.

    actually, wala naman mud na malalim and river na dadaanan... gusto ko lang sana 4x4 para in times na need ko, 4x4 na pickup ko hehehe
    Eh di 3.2 na kunin mo para "in times na need mo" 3.2 na pickup mo. Hehehe

  19. Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    59
    #19
    Quote Originally Posted by Wishing View Post
    Eh di 3.2 na kunin mo para "in times na need mo" 3.2 na pickup mo. Hehehe
    salamat po sir Wishing sa comment.. ano po masabi nyo na mas tipid daw ang 2.2L kesa 3.2L? meron rin nagsabi 3.2L mas tipid sa fuel consumption

  20. Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    2,047
    #20
    Quote Originally Posted by the_arrow View Post
    salamat po sir Wishing sa comment.. ano po masabi nyo na mas tipid daw ang 2.2L kesa 3.2L? meron rin nagsabi 3.2L mas tipid sa fuel consumption
    Fuel consumption will still depend on several factors.
    Your driving Style, Your car pick up load use, road conditions.

    If you are a lead footed driver or prefer a faster paced travel time you may be suited for a 3.2L more than a 2.2L.
    The Same with Load factor. If your pick-up carries a lot of heavy items frequently then a 3.2L might be more economical.

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4x4 AT vs 3.2L 4x4 AT