3rd gen crv 2.0 modulo vs forester 2.0

**dropzone** · July 29th, 2011 11:44 AM

any input guys, im choosing between the two, as of now parang mas gusto ko yung forester 2.0, pero im thinking to wait the 4th gen crv that will be launch soon, 1st quarter 2012 daw according to honda kal and honda fairview

**foresterx** · July 29th, 2011 11:53 AM

my vote would be the forester, not because i have one but because the CRV is such a boring car. also if the new CRV looks exactly what i have seen in the pictures so far, i'd choose the current one since from the pictures the new one is just plain ugly, no offense to CRV owners.

**dropzone** · July 29th, 2011 01:00 PM

thanks foresterx for your input,

guys anymore input please, yung scientific sana ang comparison

**Starex_Gold** · July 29th, 2011 01:25 PM

Forester 2.0X-S.

CR-V is fuel efficient and that's it. I have a CR-V 4WD naman.

The Forester is just a better CUV than CR-V

**niky** · July 29th, 2011 02:23 PM

The CR-V is superior in refinement, space, fuel economy and speed thanks to the R20 engine and the five-speed AT.

The Forester has a better ride and the benefits of all-wheel drive (for moderate off-roading). It also looks better. But the CR-V is more practical at this price point.

**cripple_rooster** · July 29th, 2011 03:08 PM

Forester has a good handling, I just don't like its gearbox limited to only 4-speed.

**foresterx** · July 29th, 2011 09:36 PM

Originally Posted by niky

The CR-V is superior in refinement, space, fuel economy and speed thanks to the R20 engine and the five-speed AT.

The Forester has a better ride and the benefits of all-wheel drive (for moderate off-roading). It also looks better. But the CR-V is more practical at this price point.

I agree with this, the CRV is the better choice but the forester is just more fun to drive. Regarding speed naman,yes the CRV is also faster but you can barely feel the difference, any car naman In the same power range you'll barely feel the difference. If you run both cars side by side don mo lang makita kung ano talaga mas mabilis. Anyway cars like the CRV and forester 2.0 aren't made for speed naman. So it depends what you want or need. If you want a fun car to drive get the forester, if you want a practical car then get the CRV.

**dropzone** · July 30th, 2011 08:09 PM

thanks again sa mga replies, maybe it's worth to wait the upcoming 2012 crv for further comparison

**dropzone** · July 30th, 2011 08:11 PM

Originally Posted by foresterx

I agree with this, the CRV is the better choice but the forester is just more fun to drive. Regarding speed naman,yes the CRV is also faster but you can barely feel the difference, any car naman In the same power range you'll barely feel the difference. If you run both cars side by side don mo lang makita kung ano talaga mas mabilis. Anyway cars like the CRV and forester 2.0 aren't made for speed naman. So it depends what you want or need. If you want a fun car to drive get the forester, if you want a practical car then get the CRV.

thanks again sa mga replies, maybe it's worth to wait the upcoming 2012 CRV for further comparison

**niky** · July 30th, 2011 09:29 PM

Originally Posted by foresterx

I agree with this, the CRV is the better choice but the forester is just more fun to drive. Regarding speed naman,yes the CRV is also faster but you can barely feel the difference, any car naman In the same power range you'll barely feel the difference. If you run both cars side by side don mo lang makita kung ano talaga mas mabilis. Anyway cars like the CRV and forester 2.0 aren't made for speed naman. So it depends what you want or need. If you want a fun car to drive get the forester, if you want a practical car then get the CRV.

For me... the fun in driving a Forester is muted when you're driving the base model. It really needs the extra power of the turbo or at least a manual transmission mated to the base engine to really feel alive. Still... it's got more pogi points and is more comfortable than the base CR-V.