New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 127

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    12,608

  2. Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    17,314
    #2
    Thanks Egan. Sayang hindi sumasagot yung sellers ng black and silver Mz6. I wonder if it's been sold already..


    Posted via Tsikot Mobile App

  3. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    6,385
    #3
    Nice find Niky.

  4. Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    12,608
    #4
    If you're thinking of getting a used 6th gen, get one that's still has a good body. The suspension of the 6th gen is quite solid (double wishbone front & back). Get it cheap and then do an H22 (half-cut) transplant. I still have mine (VTi-L 2.3L AT) but the PS system is starting to leak within the steering rack shaft assembly and it is showing some tranny sliding symptoms. I still like its handling and its body feels light, much like newer compacts. Speed may not be as fast as more modern midsize cars but it's still packs a punch compared to most compacts. I use it for coding now.

    If you want a fast 2L compact, get a stock Civic FD 2006-2008 K20 MT (as what Niky suggests) or a Focus TDCi 2007-2008 MT. They could be had for around 400-450k. A few weeks ago, I saw an ad in OLX for a used 2006 Mazda6 in Paranaque for 320k. The ad closed in a week or so.
    Last edited by Egan101; September 29th, 2014 at 10:57 AM.

  5. Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    5,179
    #5
    I know the fd 2.0 m/t is not in your prospects but just a comment... That Damn thing can go!

  6. Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    17,314
    #6
    Napaisip nga ko bigla eh. Parang biglang nakakatempt yung FD 2.0 because of the performance..

    Is the 6 really that much slower than the FD?

    Kagabi set na ko eh, biglang binalik yung FD sa equation haha.


    Posted via Tsikot Mobile App

  7. Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    5,179
    #7
    Try it bro... I'm sure you won't be disappointed.

    But at that price, your already pushing for...

    http://m.*******/index.php/view+class...ords=Evolution


  8. Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    1,362
    #8
    Civic FD! Lighter body on a 2.0 compared to the MZ3. Minus the sunroof.

  9. Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    17,314
    #9
    Masyado kasi mataas resale value ng FD na MT, 150k more than a Mazda 3 and even more than a Mazda 6.

    Yung binibenta pa sa Sulit medyo ricey (although still recoverable). Thing is, the blue paint just looks too boy-racer, but no choice naman since all 2.0 MTs came in blue.

    Mas may dating parin Mazda 6 sakin. More sleeper vibe than a Civic.

    I tried contacting all the Mz6 sellers in Sulit and AyosDito and walang nagrereply (except for one selling a white unit but with 18" BBS copy rims). Eh ayoko yung hindi stock tapos wala na daw sa kanya stock rims niya so no thanks nalang.


    Posted via Tsikot Mobile App

  10. Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    12,608
    #10
    Quote Originally Posted by jut703 View Post
    I tried contacting all the Mz6 sellers in Sulit and AyosDito and walang nagrereply (except for one selling a white unit but with 18" BBS copy rims). Eh ayoko yung hindi stock tapos wala na daw sa kanya stock rims niya so no thanks nalang.
    If the car is in good shape, I guess this will be fine. The rims & tires are some of the easiest components to replace. You can always sell those and get your choice of 17's with stock size tires. The 2006-2008 Mazda6 came stock with those multi-spoke 17s with 225/45/R17 tires (Bridgestone Potenza, I read from old reviews).

  11. Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    17,314
    #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Egan101 View Post
    For 500k, you're now looking at the newer model of the Mazda6 2.5L (2009-2012). It has grown bigger over the sleeker, more compact-size 2006-2008 2.3L model but it's more refined. I think Niky posted something regarding the comparison of both models.
    Ihink that the pre-facelift 2.5 looks uglier than the 2.3, while the facelifted 2.5 (2011 and up) is still too expensive for me. Actually in general, the 2.5's have ridiculously high asking prices compared to Accords and Camries. But yeah I read from Niky sometime before that the 2.5 is more refined, but there's something about the first gen Mz6 that feels more in tune with my personality - more agile, more rev-happy, not too mushy. I also think it's more timeless than the second gen.

    Quote Originally Posted by Egan101 View Post
    My golf buddie refused as he finds midsizers as daddy cars. He was more looking for a Civic FD/FB.
    Baliktad kami ng golf buddy mo bro. I guess I got sick of the FD because it was the most common car driven by students back in college. And hindi naman mukhang tatay yung 6 because it's not as fat and chunky as a Camry or Accord, but has the same level of features and almost the same amount of space. Most importantly, its driving dynamics are closer to a BMW than any other midsizer. And hindi pa naman ako mukhang tatay

    Quote Originally Posted by Egan101 View Post
    If the car is in good shape, I guess this will be fine. The rims & tires are some of the easiest components to replace. You can always sell those and get your choice of 17's with stock size tires. The 2006-2008 Mazda6 came stock with those multi-spoke 17s with 225/45/R17 tires (Bridgestone Potenza, I read from old reviews).
    I thought about this bro but considering the rarity of the Mz6, it might be hard to find stock rims for it, especially with the superb Potenza tires (most likely if I find a set in Evangelista it'll have some crappy Westlake tires).

  12. Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    12,608
    #12
    Quote Originally Posted by jut703 View Post
    Baliktad kami ng golf buddy mo bro. I guess I got sick of the FD because it was the most common car driven by students back in college. And hindi naman mukhang tatay yung 6 because it's not as fat and chunky as a Camry or Accord, but has the same level of features and almost the same amount of space. Most importantly, its driving dynamics are closer to a BMW than any other midsizer. And hindi pa naman ako mukhang tatay
    Yep, very common nga yung FD. You'd even have a hard time distinguishing the 2.0L models against the 1.8L models though I find most 2.0L FD owners keep their cars stock. If I were to choose, I'd still pick the Mazda6 over a Civic FD for the same price.

    Quote Originally Posted by jut703 View Post

    I thought about this bro but considering the rarity of the Mz6, it might be hard to find stock rims for it, especially with the superb Potenza tires (most likely if I find a set in Evangelista it'll have some crappy Westlake tires).
    You will have a hard time looking for stock rims for the Mazda6 but you may chance upon them in some buy&sell shops. You can always look for something similar or more refined-looking aftermarket rims. Get a used but decent set of 17s from folks who are always changing rims and selling them cheap then put on some grippy tires or performance-oriented touring tires. 18" rims will be fine with the Mazda6 as I have seen some with 19" rims on them. Most modern midsize cars have very good suspension and can easily handle bigger rim sizes without compromising its comfortable ride.

  13. Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    6,235
    #13
    Not considering the 7th gen Accord 2.4? You say that the 2.0 is underpowered, but the 2.4 is not, at least if in good condition. Perhaps you can even find a post-facelift variant, which IMHO looks much sportier. Mazda 6 2.3's are rare in the 2nd hand market, and as much as I like this car, I find the interior design not much to my liking...

    Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2

  14. Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    17,314
    #14
    Quote Originally Posted by GTi View Post
    Not considering the 7th gen Accord 2.4? You say that the 2.0 is underpowered, but the 2.4 is not, at least if in good condition. Perhaps you can even find a post-facelift variant, which IMHO looks much sportier. Mazda 6 2.3's are rare in the 2nd hand market, and as much as I like this car, I find the interior design not much to my liking...

    Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
    Well mostly because the Accord is priced the same as the Mazda 6 and the Mazda is better for me in all aspects.

    I'd rather wait for a Mz6. Not in a hurry naman.


    Posted via Tsikot Mobile App

  15. Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    3,604
    #15
    I think, having read a little of your financial thing thread -- it may be a wiser choice to put wants and fun away for the meantime and go for needs - cost (initial outlay), maintenance, reliability.

    We had an old 6th gen Accord (2.0 or 2.3 -- not sure) we let go for <200k about 8 years ago. Those are reliable and are cheap. Gas cost will depend on how much you will be using this.

    That, or maybe a compact/subcompact from the early 2000s will serve you well. Corolla ZZ? Civic ES?

    Payaman muna, BMW later? hehe.

  16. Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    17,314
    #16
    Quote Originally Posted by mda View Post
    I think, having read a little of your financial thing thread -- it may be a wiser choice to put wants and fun away for the meantime and go for needs - cost (initial outlay), maintenance, reliability.

    We had an old 6th gen Accord (2.0 or 2.3 -- not sure) we let go for <200k about 8 years ago. Those are reliable and are cheap. Gas cost will depend on how much you will be using this.

    That, or maybe a compact/subcompact from the early 2000s will serve you well. Corolla ZZ? Civic ES?

    Payaman muna, BMW later? hehe.
    Thanks for the concern bro but I've thought about it and I find that going for a Mazda 6 is still financially sound. A similarly aged compact costs the same, which is why I'm taking advantage of the low resale value of midsizers.

    Incremental fuel cost is minimal, more or less 2.5k a month. If I go for a decent car now, I won't need to buy another one in the near future, as opposed to if I settled for a 6th gen Accord or any car older than 10 years, I'll probably be left wanting something newer soon enough.

    An older car will have more repairs too. Plus, Mazda 6 owners are usually well-off car enthusiasts and I would expect that the car would be better maintained than your average compact. Major parts replacements will definitely be more expensive but then again for a fairly new car it should still be a few years down the road, and I'm not spending much on the upfront purchase nor will I be paying any monthly amortization so it's not too expensive overall.

    Also, I've been so frugal all my life that I want to splurge a little on a nice car. I commuted my entire high school and college life and I worked hard for a good education and a nice job so I want to reward myself a little. Sure I'll have to push back buying a house and lot a little bit, but not too much. I'm still much younger than most people here so I still have quite a lot of time to save.




    Posted via Tsikot Mobile App

  17. Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    6,235
    #17
    I suppose there's the answer to your dilemma. It appears that the Mazda 6 is the car that calls to your heart.

    Midsize sedans are pretty sturdy. Our 2005 Accord 2.4 is a daily driver, and has logged over 91tkms already, mostly city driving. Oil changes are done every 10tkms as with all modern Honda's. AFAIK, nothing non-consumable has been replaced, including all suspension parts. I personally don't see anything major failing anytime soon. As long as you find a well-maintained unit, you should be fine. Personally, I don't mind if it isn't very low mileage as long as it isn't ridiculously high and is well taken cared of.



    Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2

  18. Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    12,608
    #18
    For 500k, you're now looking at the newer model of the Mazda6 2.5L (2009-2012). It has grown bigger over the sleeker, more compact-size 2006-2008 2.3L model but it's more refined. I think Niky posted something regarding the comparison of both models.

    Kunting pasensya at baka biglang may sumulpot sa mga online ads dyan na good-deal na 2006-2008 Mazda6. Early this year, I was helping out a golf buddie look for a car and we found online this white Mazda6 in Makati selling for 400k. It looked stock but it had a lot of upgrades (coilovers, Cosworth intake, Hotpipes, piggyback chip). The owner listed its whp at 200hp and even mentioned the car was featured in a local car magazine. My golf buddie refused as he finds midsizers as daddy cars. He was more looking for a Civic FD/FB.

  19. Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    6,235
    #19
    Accord 3.0V6 ayaw? Halos pareho ang resale value sa 2.4 and only 1km/L less in FC as compared to the 2.4! Hehe~ :D You get cruise control, sunroof and VSA.

    Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2

  20. Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    17,314
    #20
    Quote Originally Posted by GTi View Post
    Accord 3.0V6 ayaw? Halos pareho ang resale value sa 2.4 and only 1km/L less in FC as compared to the 2.4! Hehe~ :D You get cruise control, sunroof and VSA.

    Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
    1 km/L nga lang ba? The 7th gen didn't have VCM yet IIRC and 5AT lang.

    Anyway, even if we assume that the V6 gets 5 km/L while the 2.3 gets 6 km/L, that's still an additional 20% consumption. I'm already pushing myself beyond my benchmark 7.5 km/L (Civic 1.8 FC) with the Mz6 so stretch talaga masyado yung V6.


    Posted via Tsikot Mobile App

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Which 2-liter Car to Buy?