Results 31 to 40 of 76
-
March 16th, 2011 09:07 AM #31
Kahit boring ang CR-V, it has lots of space, better looking interior than a Tucson and very fuel efficient. 9.5km/l average city driving pero sobrang light footed dapat. I prefer the CR-V as a daily driver compared sa CX-7 na mas mabilis kasi mas mabilis din sa fuel consumption ang 2.5L eh.
Maganda Tucson di lang malaki ang exterior at tacky ang interior compared to the CX-7.
-
March 16th, 2011 02:25 PM #32
Sa space, wala talagang tatalo sa CR-V. Hands down ako. Ilang cage ng aso pinagkasya ko doon e
Pero interior looks, nah. Boring din. Very simple.
I like the interior of CX-7 and Tucson. Stylish talaga, lots of buttons
Re: CX-7 FC. IMHO matipid siya kahit 2.5L, mas malakas sa gas yung CR-V 2.4S-X ko.
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Posts
- 754
March 16th, 2011 03:54 PM #33Rear seat space ng CRV is also the most spacious so passenger comfort wise, it's the best.
I expect mas matipid yun CRV 2.4 sa CX-7. CX-7 is a gas guzzler compared to CRV in US reviews. Mukhang di bagay VTEC engines sa Edsa traffic.
*SG
Na test drive mo na Xtrail ng uncle mo?
-
March 16th, 2011 08:38 PM #34
Di parin eh. Minsan lang kami magkita.
Siguro kaya mas matipid yung CX-7 kasi 4X2 lang.
Yan ang problema sa Realtime 4WD maganda power to weight ratio ng CR-V 2.4S-X. Medyo overpowered hahaha
-
March 17th, 2011 04:22 AM #35
-
March 17th, 2011 06:04 PM #36
7.3km/L na average ko sa city driving ngayon. Baka nasanay na yung CR-V.
5.9km/L kapag rezing rezing mode
-
March 17th, 2011 09:57 PM #37
I think I will have to downgrade to the Tucson GLS, the one which costs 1.158M. and look at available cars in the same price range budget constraints.
thanks for the help guys.
-
March 17th, 2011 11:27 PM #38
-
March 17th, 2011 11:44 PM #39
-
March 17th, 2011 11:52 PM #40
Will they risk kaya to have it installed with a traditional 4speed AT? Just like what they did...
Mitsubishi Xforce