Uber and Grab no more? LTFRB needs brains

[StockEngine]

Saksi: Mga pasahero, umaapela sa harap ng paghihigpit ng LTFRB laban sa mga colorum na TNVS - YouTube

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tsikot Forums mobile app

[StockEngine]

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tsikot Forums mobile app

[BratPAQ]

₱1.6 million isang modern jeepney? Gago ba sila?

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk

[j_avonni]

Have used Grab for a few times and my ride were more convenient. I wish the problems would be resolved soonest.

[makinao]

On the one hand, trabaho talaga ng LTFRB ang "franchising and regulation", so if Uber and Grab break the rules, then they get what they deserve.

On the other hand, the LTFRB is so broken that what they are doing to Uber and Grab smacks of favoritism, suppression, and ineptitude.

[BratPAQ]

On the one hand, trabaho talaga ng LTFRB ang "franchising and regulation", so if Uber and Grab break the rules, then they get what they deserve.

On the other hand, the LTFRB is so broken that what they are doing to Uber and Grab smacks of favoritism, suppression, and ineptitude.

Or they can make it a level playing field. Put grab and uber in same restrictions as taxi. Meaning standard ang singil at walang dagdag or surcharges. Bawal sa taxi ang dagdag eh so dapat bawal din sa TNVS. Same with choosing destinations. Bawal sa taxi ang mamili ng destinations. Dapat bawal din sa kanila. Ang lalabas lang sa app eh pickup point.

Or lift these 2 rules all together from taxi and TNVS. Pwede magdagdag ng singil pag rush hour. Pede rin mamili ng pasahero depende sa destinasyon.

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk

[teegust]

Or they can make it a level playing field. Put grab and uber in same restrictions as taxi. Meaning standard ang singil at walang dagdag or surcharges. Bawal sa taxi ang dagdag eh so dapat bawal din sa TNVS. Same with choosing destinations. Bawal sa taxi ang mamili ng destinations. Dapat bawal din sa kanila. Ang lalabas lang sa app eh pickup point.

Or lift these 2 rules all together from taxi and TNVS. Pwede magdagdag ng singil pag rush hour. Pede rin mamili ng pasahero depende sa destinasyon.

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk

baka maubos ang mga uber at grab if the playing field is leveled. pero sana maging wake up call din sa mga taxi ang tnvs. kung maayos at walang kalokohan mga taxi the tnvs will not be so popular. kaso problema sa mga taxi driver utak talangka din. iniisip lang nila kalaban ang uber at grab pero hinde nila iniisip why uber and grab are more preferred than them.

[jaggerx3]

Or they can make it a level playing field. Put grab and uber in same restrictions as taxi. Meaning standard ang singil at walang dagdag or surcharges. Bawal sa taxi ang dagdag eh so dapat bawal din sa TNVS. Same with choosing destinations. Bawal sa taxi ang mamili ng destinations. Dapat bawal din sa kanila. Ang lalabas lang sa app eh pickup point.

Or lift these 2 rules all together from taxi and TNVS. Pwede magdagdag ng singil pag rush hour. Pede rin mamili ng pasahero depende sa destinasyon.

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk

Or why not make all of them like taxis nga, pero pwede mag book thru app at bawal tumanggi. App based na lahat

Sent from my LG-H818 using Tapatalk

[Monseratto]

Penalty kasi ng 20% sa fare kung mag-cancel yung driver, deductable sa next customer na ma-accept...

[boybi]

Penalty kasi ng 20% sa fare kung mag-cancel yung driver, deductable sa next customer na ma-accept...

May penalty ba if customer ang magcancel?

2 weeks ago, pinagkuha ko ng grab anak ko. After a few minutes, nakita ko papalayo yung kotse so tinawagan ko. Ang reason ng driver is sobra daw traffic, mahirapan daw sya magsundo. So nag cancel nalang ako, and reason nilagay ko is "driver requested to cancel".

[uls]

i'm gonna take the unpopular side of the argument

i'm not a fan of Travis Kalanick (Uber's founder)

the guy's an Ayn Rand acolyte

(if you don't know who Ayn Rand is and her philosophy, read about it then you'll understand Uber's damn-the-rules business model)

Uber goes into cities and countries and knowingly and willingly breaks rules

That intentional rule-breaking explains how uber grew so fast

They bypassed governments around the world

Then deal with govt regulators AFTER they're established

Para sa uber, ang gobyerno ay hadlang, ang gobyerno ay kalaban

Perfectly reflects Ayn Rand's rightwing anti-govt libertarian ideology

[leonleon]

That intentional rule-breaking explains how uber grew so fast

They bypassed governments around the world

Then deal with govt regulators AFTER they're established

Pano naman si Grab?

Ayn Rand Acolyte din ba founder ng Grab?

Lumalabag din kasi sila.

[uls]

Pano naman si Grab?

Ayn Rand Acolyte din ba founder ng Grab?

Lumalabag din kasi sila.

i didnt bother to research who founded Grab and what his/her philiosophy is

obviously Grab copied Uber's business model

[Archerfish]

i'm gonna take the unpopular side of the argument

i'm not a fan of Travis Kalanick (Uber's founder)

the guy's an Ayn Rand acolyte

(if you don't know who Ayn Rand is and her philosophy, read about it then you'll understand Uber's damn-the-rules business model)

Uber goes into cities and countries and knowingly and willingly breaks rules

That intentional rule-breaking explains how uber grew so fast

They bypassed governments around the world

Then deal with govt regulators AFTER they're established

Para sa uber, ang gobyerno ay hadlang, ang gobyerno ay kalaban

Perfectly reflects Ayn Rand's rightwing anti-govt libertarian ideology

I've read partially about Ayn Rand, "My philosophy, in essence, is the concept of man as a heroic being, with his own happiness as the moral purpose of his life, with productive achievement ..."

What if someone has this extreme definition of pursuing happiness by simply killing someone who doesn't agree with his opinion? On a lighter side, it is possible to pursue happiness by your own definition and hurt people around you. Of course, you can never please everyone. However, I find it selfish for anyone to have his happiness as the moral purpose of his life.

[kagalingan]

mabigat pangangailangan ni deakin....

[uls]

I've read partially about Ayn Rand, "My philosophy, in essence, is the concept of man as a heroic being, with his own happiness as the moral purpose of his life, with productive achievement ..."

What if someone has this extreme definition of pursuing happiness by simply killing someone who doesn't agree with his opinion? On a lighter side, it is possible to pursue happiness by your own definition and hurt people around you. Of course, you can never please everyone. However, I find it selfish for anyone to have his happiness as the moral purpose of his life.

the essence of Rand's philosophy is selfishness

Selfish pursuit of one's goals

Let nobody stand in the way

Lahat ng hadlang ay kalaban

Ang gobyerno ay kalaban

Kalanick lived that philosophy and it showed in the way Uber went into cities across the globe

[radz15]

The main argument based on LTFRB ay dapat ma regulate ang uber/grab due to SAFETY of the passengers. Kaya andaming nag rarant sa mga social media sites dahil pinapalabas ng LTFRB na mas SAFE ang taxis, bus, fx, jeepneys dahil regulated sila. Isa pa sa sinasabi ng spokesperson ng LTFRB na dapat may Financial capacity ang operator ng Uber/Grab incase may accident na mangyari para may pambayad sila. Mukang hindi nag reresearch ang mga ugok na taga LTFRB. May insurance ang uber/grab Incase ma aksidente ang pasahero nito.

Sent from my H220 using Tapatalk

[minicarph]

since nauuso na naman ang self-driving cars, why not mag-drive yun car sa pickup point tapos ikaw na lang mag-drive sa destination mo then mag-drive yun car sa next pickup point ng next passenger

para wala nang problema sa driver

[uls]

The main argument based on LTFRB ay dapat ma regulate ang uber/grab due to SAFETY of the passengers. Kaya andaming nag rarant sa mga social media sites dahil pinapalabas ng LTFRB na mas SAFE ang taxis, bus, fx, jeepneys dahil regulated sila. Isa pa sa sinasabi ng spokesperson ng LTFRB na dapat may Financial capacity ang operator ng Uber/Grab incase may accident na mangyari para may pambayad sila. Mukang hindi nag reresearch ang mga ugok na taga LTFRB. May insurance ang uber/grab Incase ma aksidente ang pasahero nito.

Sent from my H220 using Tapatalk

mahina kasi sa reasoning ang LTFRB

sana sinabi nila nang derecho -- kung ang sasakyan mo gagamitin mo pang transport ng tao kapalit ang pera, dapat may permit ka galing sa gobyerno

safety safety whatever

[BratPAQ]

The main argument based on LTFRB ay dapat ma regulate ang uber/grab due to SAFETY of the passengers. Kaya andaming nag rarant sa mga social media sites dahil pinapalabas ng LTFRB na mas SAFE ang taxis, bus, fx, jeepneys dahil regulated sila. Isa pa sa sinasabi ng spokesperson ng LTFRB na dapat may Financial capacity ang operator ng Uber/Grab incase may accident na mangyari para may pambayad sila. Mukang hindi nag reresearch ang mga ugok na taga LTFRB. May insurance ang uber/grab Incase ma aksidente ang pasahero nito.

Sent from my H220 using Tapatalk

Lahat ng pasahero in all units of Uber and Grab are covered by insurance? Remind me, ano nga reason bakit ayaw tumanggap ng bagong franchise ang LTFRB.

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk