subaru impreza 2.0R Sport vs Lancer 2.0 gls???

**crash_kid** · February 7th, 2011 12:05 PM

Originally Posted by foresterx

6-8km/ltr and 210kph ang impreza.

base on my exparience 6-8km/L with upak...but when normal driving my FC is 9-10km/L mix highway and city,yes impreza 2.0r m/t is limited to 210kph..i think lancer ex is 220kph

**niky** · February 7th, 2011 12:43 PM

The Subaru 2.0R is plain boring in AT form. The Lancer is more fun in MT, but the Lancer CVT is very, very good and very responsive.

MT versus MT, both drive very well. The Subaru hatchback has a better balance, and you can do a little four-wheel drifting if the surface is slippery enough, but sedan versus sedan, it's very similar. Both good to drive, both have lots of grip and both understeer at the limit.

In terms of speed and fuel economy, it's simply no contest... the Lancer wins on both counts.

In terms of interior... the Subaru wins it... better trim, and I like the interior design better, even if it's a bit "old-school." but the Lancer is more spacious.

**bulletweight** · February 7th, 2011 12:46 PM

so, which is which po talaga? i have limited time to choose kasi. its either the impreza or lancer gls.

**foresterx** · February 7th, 2011 12:53 PM

Originally Posted by bulletweight

so, which is which po talaga? i have limited time to choose kasi. its either the impreza or lancer gls.

both cars are just too damn close for us to decide, better test drive both and see which you'll like better.

**ghosthunter** · February 7th, 2011 12:59 PM

Originally Posted by bulletweight

so, which is which po talaga? i have limited time to choose kasi. its either the impreza or lancer gls.

Curiously, why the EX/GLS vs the 2.0R? Check the price discounts for the Lancer EX and you can get the Lancer EX GTA the same price level for the Subaru Impreza 2.0R.

So for me, Lancer EX GTA.

**niky** · February 7th, 2011 01:22 PM

If you're getting an AT, definitely get the GTA. It has paddle shifters... responsive paddle shifters, a kick-ass sound system and a full body kit.

If you're getting an MT... test-drive both and see which you prefer, because that one is too close to call.

**bulletweight** · February 7th, 2011 02:48 PM

Originally Posted by foresterx

both cars are just too damn close for us to decide, better test drive both and see which you'll like better.

yeah, tough decision... hehhe.. tnx

**McQueen** · February 7th, 2011 02:48 PM

Lancer for me. It definitely is better looking.. it has more aggressive and sportier look than the impreza.

Originally Posted by bulletweight

ano bang mas matulin sa kanila?

I heard that the 2.0 impreza M/T is around 90-95 whp. (due to its AWD)
Lancer CVT is 115-120 whp and Lancer M/T is around 125 whp.

**bulletweight** · February 7th, 2011 09:30 PM

Originally Posted by ghosthunter

Curiously, why the EX/GLS vs the 2.0R? Check the price discounts for the Lancer EX and you can get the Lancer EX GTA the same price level for the Subaru Impreza 2.0R.

So for me, Lancer EX GTA.

i think i'll go for lancer glx... natest drive ko impreza kanina parang pigil ang arangkada.. i'll try ung lancer nmn...